Slashdot Mirror


Was the Lokitorrent Suit a Hoax?

kamhp writes "Recently earthreactor.com published an article stating that the whole Loki Torrent suit was a fraud and that it was all staged to collect donations toataling in the tens of thousands then sell the domain. "It seems that the owner of LokiTorrent decided to take the donation money and run, and to cover his tracks, scare the hell out of the entire p2p community. The scare tactic was probably nothing but a decoy to convince intelligent people not to ask the right questions" "

9 of 457 comments (clear)

  1. Does anyone bother checking facts? by nuclear305 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it's such a hoax what exactly do you call this? (Google's HTML Version)

    "The MPAA's efforts to date have resulted in a 40 percent reduction in the number of servers that continue to operate. One such site that will no longer exist is LokiTorrent?one of the largest BitTorrent host servers. The operator of that site, Edward Webber, agreed to not only pay a substantial settlement with even greater financial penalties for any further such actions, but by Court Order must provide the MPAA with access to and copies of all logs and server data related to his illegal BitTorrent activities, which will provide a roadmap to others who have used LokiTorrent to engage in illegal activities."

    The premise of the article is based entirely on the fact that there is no documentation from the MPAA--but indeed there is such documentation. I know we'd all love to believe the MPAA created that release to capitalize on this so-called hoax but no doubt that would be subject to legal action for such blatant lies.

    The article also states "If LokiTorrent.com had been sued in Dallas Federal Courts, then some type of public record would appear. NO ONLINE RECORD APPEARS WHATSOEVER!"

    So...if it's not on the internet, it must not exist right....right!?

    Did anyone bother contacting the MPAA for a comment on the Lokitorrent case rather than providing more fire to the rumor mill?

    1. Re:Does anyone bother checking facts? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who trusts a site named after the Norse god of TRICKS and MISCHIEF?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. Remember what LokiTorrent was? by Rei · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...There's no honor among thieves.

    --
    Don't take a knife to a gunfight, or even a knife to a knife fight. Take a gun to a knife fight.
  3. Re:Doesn't make sense! by pavera · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because you can't "buy" all episodes of all tv shows, that is the main thing my wife looks for on torrent sites, you can buy some really popular shows, but most you can't buy.... so how else are you supposed to get the content?

  4. Re:This is disgusting by anonicon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Its disgusting as to how some people make money by stealing from the very people who decided to help them out. I'm yet to do my research on the authenticity of this news bit."

    As you and many of your preceding posters are testament to, you will fly half way around the world with a lie or rumor before bothering to check to see if it's actually true.

    It appears this rumor is false, but you /could/ take a moment to actually check it for yourself.

  5. Slashdot sued for fraud and slander by cyberlotnet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://www.mpaa.org/CurrentReleases/2005_02_10_Bit TorrentLokitorrent.doc

    To link to a article about someones opinion is one thing but to support and spread lies and slander is just plain wrong

  6. Re:Claims against what exactly? by Jhon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since the donations were requested to help fight a legal battle on the grounds that the **PA were misusing copyright law, or the law itself was flawed, I think the argument would be different than you lampoon.

    Many people believe that the law is wrong, or poorly written or poorly executed -- and noone has followed a legal battle from beginning to end -- except maybe napster. Even they settled in the end, no? They didn't go 'all they way'.

    I believe copyrights are being abused -- by those downloading copyrighted materials, but also the copyright holders, too. There is NO logical reason why Mickey Mouse isn't in the public domain now. The 'bittorrents' and p2p in general are just a symptom of a much larger problem...

  7. Meta-hoax by serutan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The new generation of hoaxes that label real events as hoaxes and hoaxes as real. Perhaps the above post is a hoax too?

    Side note from the MPAA's war-cry page: "By deeply cutting into revenues, movie piracy limits the choices for consumers at the box office. Sixty percent of all movies never recoup their production and marketing costs which average well over $100 million."

    Sigh. The fact that most movies didn't recoup production costs in the decades before p2p, the Web or VCRs ever existed seems to have slipped under the radar.

  8. Re:Clairify that comment,plz by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > Most of the people I swap warez with are folks I'd
    > trust my life with.

    Clearly you are not a developer.

    I support open source projects because I want to give the dishonest big guys a kick in the nuts. I have no desire to actually behave in a similar manner.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.