Microsoft Ponders Shared-Sourcing SQL Server
i_frame writes "C|net is reporting in an interview with Tom Rizo, director of product management in Microsoft's SQL server unit, that 'the company is thinking about including the forthcoming SQL Server 2005 in Microsoft's shared-source program for disclosing product source to customers'.
Is Microsoft reinventing themselves, and are they ready to learn the benefits of open source?" From the article: "It's not finalized. It's not anything there, but if a lot of customers demand it, we'll definitely look at doing shared source with SQL Server..."
Checking for dupes?
Hey mods, the above post was a JOKE!!!
...
MSFT always claims they're "innovating"
bah
Some mods are just plain stupid me thinks.
I know I should know better than to reply to this but PLEASE. It's spelled Europe and please don't include the British in that phrase. We can't help where our island is!
Lunix will prosper only when it is licensed under the GNAA Protective License (GPL). Either that, or the Microsoft Shared Source License. It would make it a viable alternative to the awesome Windows Operating System, something which it can never hope to achieve with it's current restrictive licensing scheme.
It is here, too. But they're unbelievably well paid retardates. Don't understand it myself.
To be honest, you're welcome to take soccer if you like. It'll fit in with the rest of your pansy sports. We'll keep the proper stuff here.
Oh, I'm sorry... was that meant to be an insult? Hehe. Everyone knows what a girly sport (soccer) football is.