Interview With Lawrence Lessig On Future Rights
tres3 writes "In an interview with the O'Reilly Network Mr. Lessig discusses many current issues that may have future legal implications. He starts with
MGM's request for Certiorari in the Grokster case. His conclusion is that ReplayTV was forced out of business by a legal challenge, not a legal victory. Lessig continues on to discuss, among other things, The Creative Commons and their new
Sampling License and how it may affect the way that some movies and music, that contain samples from other sources, are made in the future. From the article: 'So the same act of creativity in some sense, you know, taking, creating, mixing out of what other people do, is legal in the text world and illegal in the digital media world.'"
This is resampling the digital text of the alphabet, am I infringing? I often ponder, Opps, there is someone at the door, hold on.....
... how this article for me loaded with an audio-enabled ad for Vonage that created a derivative work in my headphones over top of Radiohead.... hrmm... Did they have a license to do that in my ears?
It sounds just like: Every kitchen tools producers need to be sued because some of their customers use those tools in 55% of murder cases.
It's Oscar (tm) night eve and the MPAA wonks are coked up and have mod points.
Need Mercedes parts ?
No, you don't understand. Killing people^H^H^H^H^H^H consumers reduces corporate sales and profits. That's the reason murder is illegal.
Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
or they said there is no incentive to grow food, unless farmers could rip up your garden ... most people would see these as the awful values that they are.
Now you're being silly. Of course farmers can't rip up your garden; that's a right reserved for Monsanto.