Slashdot Mirror


Senators Clinton and Kerry Submit Open Voting Bill

An anonymous reader writes "DailyKos is reporting that a group of senators and representatives including Hillary Clinton, John Kerrry, and Tubbs Jones, have proposed an 'open-source' voting bill. This bill (The Count Every Vote Act of 2005) corrects many of the problems in the last election. Notably, it requires paper receipts, and that the source and object code of all electronic voting machines to be open and readable by the public. " Commentary on the bill available at the Miami Herald.

5 of 1,037 comments (clear)

  1. Corporate Lobbies vs. Public Interest by smug_lisp_weenie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it just me, or do all politics lately revolve around this same theme?

    Corporate lobbies push for proprietary voting machines, the public interest is for open-source voting machines.
    Corporate lobbies want extensions to patent laws, public interest is to reasonably limit patent protections.
    Corpate lobbies want to DRM everything with legal enforcement, public interest is to have fair use.

    The more explanations I hear as to why corporate lobbying is a necessary evil, the more convinced I become of how much of a negative influence they are having on our society.

    ...but then, on slashdot we're probably all just hopeless libertarians anyway ;)

    1. Re:Corporate Lobbies vs. Public Interest by oirtemed · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Thats why campaign contributions should only be able to be made by those legally able to vote. That would eliminate corporate donations, and if some CEO wanted to put up their own money, it would be more visible. While this doesn't address lobbying in particular, it is a start.

      The best solution would be more Congressional accountability, but that is not so easy to achieve.

  2. voting reform by liquid+stereo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This won't happen. For one, it makes too much sense. But, the biggest reason why it won't happen is because the government has been bought and the owners like what they have.

  3. Re:I agree with Kerry & Clinton? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is an area where reasonable people of all political persuasions ought to be able to come to an agreement. Based on your comment, I'm guessing that you're a conservative and I'd probably disagree with at least three-quarters of your beliefs -- but the one thing we can almost certainly agree on is that every eligible voter who wants to vote should be able to do so in a way that guarantees that vote is counted. We may argue all day about policy, but the mechanisms by which that policy is created and enacted must be trustworthy if that policy is to be anything more than the whim of a few autocrats.

    So, what Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Greens, independents, and, hell, I don't know, Prohibitionists and Natural Law believers all ought to ask themselves is: if anyone, of any party or stripe, opposes this -- what possible reason can they have for such opposition; or whether, what reason that does not mark them as irredeemably evil?

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  4. the problems with last years election by b17bmbr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the only real problem with last years election is that for most of /.ers, the wrong guy won. the us civil rights commission did two exhaustive studies of florida. guess what? nothing. no fraud, no intimidation, no disenfranchisement. sorry go home. the press did a thorough recount of the ballots. every scenario. guess what. bush still wins. if you want the links, i'll find them, but we're finding voter reg. fraud in ohio, but oops, they'er democratic. and washington state. please. dead people voting, "discovered" ballots, 500 people registered at the same address. recounts until the democrat wins.

    i'm honestly taking sides, because i think there's going to be an amount of chicanery on both sides. but if this is your kool-aid, and you focus on voting problems, a system which has served us for 200 years, then you're living in la la land. the 1960 election was won by fraud. nixon didn't run around the country for years claiming he was robbed, etc. if you're unhappy, how about volunteering next time, as the democrats had to pay campaign workers, while the republicans had 1 million volunteers. oh, and lastly, if you're hanging out at kos, oh nevermind...

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.