UK Establishes Fragmented Nanopolicy
hlovy writes "The BBC has a piece on British Science Minister Lord Sainsbury's long-sought reaction to a yearlong Royal Society study on the environmental and societal implications of nanotechnology. I've written ad nauseam on the Royal Society report here, here and even for the Wall Street Journal here."
Rather than actually doing anything with Nanotechnology, the UK should instead follow the lead of many Wall St companies and just put the prefix "Nano" in their name. Nano-Kingdom sounds pretty good to me.
Once you do this, you can expect all kinds of amazing profits!
I'm a big tall mofo.
Hey - what's up?! You're making us sound like incompetent bumbling fools! :) We invented the backtick (`), don't you know?
Get your own free personal location tracker
If it can be done, it will - reports be damned!
Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!
So you could almost say that their nanopolicy is in lots of tiny parts, scattered about, each individually working towards a common goal?
Sounds appropriate.
.. but unfortunately no one could read it cause it was written on a pinhead.
Prince Charles spent hours having the charter written into his scalp and was said to be "over the moon".
"So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
He made a mint putting "Nano" into his comedy routine. Shazbot!
Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
I for one welcome our tiny nanolords.
and then I hit myself for it, sorry.
Dave