MGM v. Grokster: Here's Why P2P is Valuable
Briefs defending Grokster's right to exist were filed yesterday in MGM v. Grokster, from Intel, Creative Commons [PDF], and many others. Among them, 17 computer science professors laid out the case for P2P, beginning with principles: "First, the United States' description of the Internet's design is wrong. P2P networks are not new developments in network design, but rather the design on which the Internet itself is based." Pointedly, the EFF compares this case's arguments to those made over 20 years ago in the Betamax case, which established the public's right to use video-copying technology, because of its "substantial non-infringing uses," even though many used videotape to infringe copyright. We'll soon see whether that right will extend to peer-to-peer software: the Supreme Court takes this up on March 29th.
But, judging from your low /. UID, you are a useless hippy who hates America and Jesus.
Oh wait, is it the IP packets after all?
Thus proving that the mods are complete and total idiots. :)
I guess there isn't a moderation for "self-referentially ironic".
Daniel
Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
I'm sure we'll find a technical solution to the problems presented by this Tragedy of the Commons just like we were able to find a technical solution for the similar one with Spam.
Oh, wait...
//Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
No no... I mean, what's being distributed in higher volume than copyrighted material?
Porn
Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
If you want advice on how to get paid lots of money without showing results, though, he's your guy.
Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
Wait a moment! Butterfly knives serve a very useful purpose. They make it easier to spot the people with no clue how to use a knife in a fight or as a tool.