Old Film to DVD Transfers Examined
Richard W.M. Jones writes "Slate is
running an interesting article on the process involved in
Warner Brothers remastering films, the quality of the films being compared to the Criterion Collection discs.
Going back to the original
technicolor
negatives, preserved in temperature-controlled
rooms, the transfer begins with a 4,000
line scan, followed by digital alignment of
each color." From the article: "In some ways, these DVDs have finer color and detail than even the original film prints. In the old days, it was difficult to align those three strips perfectly. The task became still harder years later, when the films were reissued, because the negatives had stretched or shrunk over time. If you need all three strips to get the right color, and you can't line the strips up precisely, then the colors and the sharpness are going to be a bit off."
And here I've been thinking all those movies were 3-d! Apparently it was just a red/blue misalignment.
Your family shot your home movies in three strip Technicolor?
...
Are you Cecil B. DeMille III or something?
Nope sorry just us Barrymores here
-- (Score:i , Imaginary)
That's way too much work. Just pay some neighborhood kids to re-enact those old films of your children going up and record it digitally this time.
In fact, I hear that's what George Lucas did with his old home movies. You can even add in some hilarious CGI sidekicks!
Turns out John Wane and other early movie stars looked better in the fuzzy colors. Something to do with their alien ability to bend light. Okay so that last statement was a bit much.
> My daughter, when she was 10, could look at a movie on television and tell me whether or not it was shot in Technicolor.
Yeah... It says so at the beginning of the movie...