Flash Developers Fear Spectre of Spyware
SomeGuyNamedMike writes "I realize the thought of using Flash and Actionscript is considered beneath many Slashdotters, but here's this piece, anyway: Macromedia is receiving (and answering) a a lot of flack from several blogs over its decision to package Yahoo! Toolbar with its Flash player. Will your company develop Flash content knowing Macromedia is using its runtime as its own marketing piece?"
In case it's needed.
= 53
http://www.turdhead.com.nyud.net:8090/index.php?p
http://www.hyperology.com.nyud.net:8090/?p=90
In case of Slashdotting, break mirror.
See here.
Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
It is more than time for an open source Flash player...
Anyone know of any?
GPLFlash is a project to develop just such a player.
lasindi
I have discovered a truly remarkable proof of this theorem that this sig is too small to contain.
It seems Flash is going in three directions:
- Flex -- Enterprise Flash based on XML
- Central -- A way for them to use Flash to develop consumer apps
- Classic Flash
Classic Flash is completely hamstrung to prevent it from doing things like writing to your HD, communicating outside the basic arena of your own web site, etc. They are really paranoid about it becoming used for *other people's* spyware/malware.
Now, as far as Flash being spyware itself, they will go as far as the market lets them. If they, like any company, can make money through software add-ons like Yahoo!! toolbar, they will. But it seems unlikely that they will damage their reputation by overstepping, especially when the big money is potentially in Flex, etc.
So how do I know that they are not going to install
anything else on the system. It does not matter much we banned macromedia's web site at the company as soon as we noticed it started installing yahoo toolbar. 100% loss of all trust, they just got placed in the same ranks as Real and Kazzaa
Got Code?
I just installed it. It asked me if I wanted the toolbar. I said no. End of story.
Paranoia.
vk.
There is an alternative. It's called Scalable Vector Graphics(SVG). It's a W3C recommendation, and adobe already has a free viewer on every important platform.
Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/flash/flash_fil e_format_specification.pdf
Check out Processing http://processing.org and Laszlo http://openlaszlo.org for some 'early' options. Processing is still scripting/programming based and outputs Java applets but is a decent start to a Flash alternative using Java. Laszlo is an XML + Javascript language for creating web applications that currently outputs to swf. There has been talk about publishing to Java and DotNet. Laszlo also has an IDE plug-in for Eclipse. While neither Processing or Laszlo are nowhere near as easy to use for designers as Flash is - they are a start. Problem is programmers are required to make the ide tools for non-programmers to use.
Actually, Flash content can be made *more* accessible than HTML content when authored properly.
i ty /features/flash/faq.htmlo m/macromedia/accessibility /
No, really.
http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/accessibil
http://www.macromedia.c
Flash apps can be made section 508 compliant. You just need good developers and a bigger pot-o-gold.
Strong Mad - 2008: "I PRESIDENT!"
well, this isn't full blown yet, but it's a good start.
Fourth, the site uses blind links. I don't know what will happen until I click.
Sixth, some advertisers abuse flash. I removed flash when mousing over a flash banner ad (to reach the URL bar) poped up a new window. No click needed. The same advertiser did the same thing on the right side of the page so I would get new windows if I tried to use the scroll bar. Flash completely lacks end user controls. It has no stop button unless the content provider is nice enough to include one. There is enough abuse of this to keep flash off my machine entirely.
The truth shall set you free!