Judge Finds For Apple in ThinkSecret Case

Posted by Zonk on Friday March 4, 2005 @01:47AM from the you-lose-some dept.

An anonymous reader writes: "In a case with implications for the freedom to blog, a San Jose judge tentatively ruled Thursday that Apple Computer can force three online publishers to surrender the names of confidential sources who disclosed information about the company's upcoming products. The San Jose news piece has the most detail on the ruling while Mac Daily News has some background on the case, and Gizmodo vociferously expresses an opinion on the lawsuit. We've covered the case in the past as well.

1 of 711 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Um, NO, he's not by Anonymous Coward · 2005-03-04 04:39 · Score: -1, Redundant

Woz is even contributing to the poor boy's legal fund. He's not forgotten the garage (even if Jobs has).

Woz is contributing to the legal fund of a completely different case, the distribution of the Tiger build. Some people really need to pay attention to what they're reading and posting on Slashdot.