UK Record Industry Starts Suing Filesharers
An anonymous reader writes "The BBC has the story that the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) has started a first set of lawsuits against UK file sharers. 23 people paid £50,000 to settle out of court. This is the first time people in the UK have been fined, and probably won't be the last. From the article: "We are determined to find people who illegally distribute music, whichever peer-to-peer network they use, and to make them compensate the artists and labels they are stealing from."
That ignored the premise. The premise was the case, under which the vast majority of file sharing falls, that the person who downloads the file would *not* have purchased it otherwise. I asked for who is the victim in such a situation.
You are postulating a different situation: the far rarer "person would have bought the album, but chose to download it instead" situation. I have trouble believing that the number of those people is significant enough to cause any notable decrease in seller property value. Things like every so often suing someone who file shares seems to be enough to keep this crowd to a minimum.
Clean coal harnesses the awesome power of the word 'clean'.