Interview With The SpamAssassin
comforteagle writes "Howard Wen has conducted an interview with Daniel Quinlan of SpamAssassin. In it he explores what keeps Daniel motivated in the face of the unrelenting torrent of spam and new spamming techniques, as well as, what is working - what is not, and what he predicts spammers have up their sleeves next for defeating spam detection." From the interview: "If you don't mind deleting spam manually, that's your prerogative, but don't complain about it. If your ISP doesn't do a good job fighting spam, then switch ISPs or install your own anti-spam software. There are a lot of choices out there."
v1agr@ r0g@1n3
Who has noticed a decrease in the effectiveness of Spam Assasin. I have! Anyone else?
I bet he has cool business cards:
Daniel Quinlan - Spam Assassin
He can tell people his job is to kill spammers. Which reminds me, I wonder if anyone at the IRS actually checks what job title you put on your tax forms?
I Am My Own Worst Enemy
When I get spam I don't want I just unsubscribe from it. "WHAT DO YOU MEAN IT WILL TAKE 72 HOURS TO REMOVE MY ADDRESS?"
ow. My brain is starting to hurt.
"Not spam" does not whitelist senders. It moves messages. Maybe I'm missing something.
I really should have just posted AC, having gotten three replies that went:
1) google radiates golden benefince, you suck for criticizing them
2) see that "not spam" button? the shiny one? don't lick it, click it! good boy!
3) Use another email client, you're not firewalled or anything, and you configure this client everywhere you go, right? Aren't I clever for knowing about its existence?
My blood pressure really cannot stand slashdot these days.
I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot