No Formal Risk Analysis of Hubble Rescue by NASA
Somegeek writes "
SpaceDaily.com is running a story that
NASA never performed a formal risk analysis of a shuttle mission to rescue the Hubble Space Telescope before they decided to cancel the mission on grounds of risk. The story quotes Fred Gregory, the current acting NASA administrator, as stating that previous NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe made the decision "based on what he perceived was the risk". This perceived risk is in performing a manned shuttle mission that is out of range of using the International Space Station as an emergency refuge. The Hubble's current batteries and gyroscopes will probably fail in a few years, leaving the dead telescope to crash back to earth around year 2020."
I guess it would be poetic justice if it fell down to Earth and landed on Fred Gregory.
We should just beat up the enterprise fans with their lunchboxes and take their money.
The problem many libertarians have with NASA is that they've completely destroyed the spaceflight market
"Libertarian, n: Someone who believes the free market to be such a powerful and important force that it can overcome human selfishness itself, yet so weak it can't survive in the presence of some form of government."