Slashdot Mirror


EU Software Patent Directive Adopted

sebFlyte writes "FTA: "An EU Council spokeswoman said on Monday morning that the Computer Implemented Inventions Directive had been adopted." Apparently it's due to 'institutional reasons' that they're ignoring the outcry from developers and several nation states ..."

9 of 455 comments (clear)

  1. Note that this means it goes back to Parliament by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Note that this means it goes back to parliament for a second reading (where an _absolute_ majority of 376 votes in the Parliament or something like that is needed to do *anything* about it (i.e. abstentions, absences, etc. count as votes _for_ the directive) - seems to be corruption is build into system, but there you go).

    Time for a straightforward declaration of our own, I think:

    "We, the undersigned, will not honour or respect european patent law any more. There are millions of us. You'll have to kill us all before you ever get your patent monopolies, you corrupt corporatist fuckers. Good day."

  2. It's Not Oer Yet... by PipianJ · · Score: 5, Informative

    RTFA. The European Parliament still has to vote on it, and have rejected it before.

  3. Always go to ffii.org by Baron+Eekman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Best information source for the EU patent-problem.

    Here's the press release

  4. Re:It still has to go for a 2nd reading... by elgaard · · Score: 5, Informative

    You better start explaining to your MEP why this is so important.

    The second reading will be much more difficult than the first reading because this time they need a majority of all MEP's (not just MEP's present) to change the directive.

  5. FFII Press Release by Halo1 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Available here.

    And as someone else already said: the Council has adopted its "common position" (although it was far from common in this case). It still has to get into the European Parliament, through its second reading (where it can be amended or even rejected, after which the whole game is immediately over).

    Anyway, as far as I am concerned, the big news is not what they adopted (a directive text which codifies the European Patent Office's US practice), but how they adopted it. Three countries with the support of several others asked to reopen discussions, and the Luxembourg presidency simply denied that even though they have to let the Council as a whole decide about that according to their own rules of procedure (point 3.8).

    --
    Donate free food here
  6. Re:It still has to go for a 2nd reading... by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 4, Informative

    The second reading will require a 2/3 majority. I.e. all hands on deck for a topic that is not likely to attract votes from ordinary EU citizens. The Dutch minister for instance seemed to be quite confident that this will not happen. The Christian Democrats' votes will be crucial.

    --
    -------
    Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
  7. Re:What's the matter? If you don't agree you have. by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 4, Informative
    You're new here, aren't you? (sorry, had to say it)

    No one is defending stealing. The problem is (or this is the belief of many here) that it is not possible to write software without violating patents unvoluntarily: if you write a large enough software package, you just end up implementing patented algorithms without realising it. This leads to a situation where only big corporations can develop software (since they have a stack patents that they can bargain with when someone claims they're violating a patent). A "GNU license" is not going to help you there.

  8. Re:Implications for a European believer in democra by Cardinal+Biggles · · Score: 4, Informative
    The autumn, I will go to the polls and vote "No". I urge any Europeans with similar concerns to adopt the same position.

    Stopping the new Constitution will not get rid of the EU, or make it more democratic. Voting "no" will keep it the way it is now.

    So you would be doing the "people who have a complete disinterest in democracy" a big favour by voting "No".

    The new European Constitution greatly enhances the powers of the European Parliament, and so tricks like what the Council did today would become a lot harder.

    There are 2 ways out of this undemocratic EU. One is to get rid of it. This is clearly not an option -- almost all economic growth in Europe in the last 20 years is due to the single market. Removing it would be an economic disaster.

    Option 2 is to overhaul the EU to make it a lot more democratic. While I agree that it doesn't go far enough, the new Constitution is a huge step in the right direction.

    So, please vote "Yes" on the new Constitution. It's our only way out!

  9. Re:So they broke the procedure by Halo1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The European Parliament and individual EU member states can lodge a complaint at the European Court of Justice, yes. Additionally, if the directive ever comes through, individual citizens can also lodge a complain at the European Court of Justice if they feel it tramples on their liberties.

    --
    Donate free food here