Slashdot Mirror


Ohio Wants eBayers to Post $50k Bond

MacDork writes "CNNMoney posted a short article this morning about new Ohio regulations set to become effective May 2 this year. If you are in the state and selling on eBay, you will need to pay $200 for a license and post a $50,000 bond or face possible fines and jail time. Getting the license also requires a one-year apprenticeship. When asked to which eBay users this bill applied, the bill's author, Larry Mumper responded with these very specific guidelines.... "It certainly will not apply to the casual seller on eBay, but might apply to anyone who sells a lot.""

13 of 841 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Typical government stupidity by jweage · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    So self-defense is not a legitimate use of a handgun? I guess that is why 30+ states allow their citizens to carry handguns for self-defense.

    This line of thinking is wrong at so many levels, but this isn't the time or place.

  2. Re:Typical government stupidity by jacquesm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I take it you're an expert on Amsterdam and Heroin then ?

  3. Or you agreed w/ everything but the last sentence by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    His insights are correct. And his insights on guns are correct as well.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  4. Re:Typical government stupidity by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Not decriminalized, but its treated more as a medical/social problem than a criminal problem. Addicts are unlikely to go to jail, but if they want to give it up there is assistance available.

    Marijuana and (I think) some forms of mushrooms are fine.

  5. Re:Typical government stupidity by MindStalker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes, but untill you stop all production of guns and remove every single gun from this country, and stop all guns at the border, you will have guns in the hands of criminals.

  6. hmmm no tax then on heroin by nounderscores · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    my mistake. If they did tax it, sell licences to deal, imagine the money they'd make.

  7. Re:Modded insightful? Gun control stupid? by radish · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How is this a good thing?
    There will be less guns on the street. That is always a good thing.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  8. Re:Typical government stupidity by rogabean · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If I had mod points right now I would mod you (Funny as All Hell, if a bit scary)

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
  9. Re:Modded insightful? Gun control stupid? by UnrefinedLayman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh: and don't forget baseball bats, kitchen knives, etc. There are all sorts of people out there "intending to break the law" with those tools, too.

    I'm not taking issue with what else you said, but keep in mind that baseball bats are made for hitting baseballs, kitchen knives are made for preparing food and occasionally opening envelopes, and guns are made for moving little pieces of metal very fast into people. They're also used as a deterrent, but the threat is always that those little pieces of metal can run faster than you.

    Baseball bats, of course, are highly multi-functional devices. They're just sticks, after all. And knives? Very multi-function as well, and are just sticks with sharp metal for one end. And they've been around since, oh, the bronze age. Guns, on the other hand, are complicated devices of recent invention. They have no real purpose other than shooting bullets; they weren't designed on the concept of a stick, they were designed on the concept of shooting people. Guns are fundamentally different from the other items you mentioned, which is why they're treated differently.

  10. Re:Or you agreed w/ everything but the last senten by badasscat · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    His insights are correct. And his insights on guns are correct as well.

    Educate yourself. The statistics speak for themselves. The fact is gun control works, in many, many countries throughout the world.

    If you don't believe the numbers in the article, just do a Google search yourself. You'll find plenty of "official" sources that list the exact same numbers.

    Burning massive karma here, but it boggles my mind how people can plainly ignore or dispute facts that are right there in front of them.

    Or are his insights into the world being flat correct as well?

  11. Re:Or you agreed w/ everything but the last senten by Chatterton · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And you say that reducing by 20% gun crime is not something that could be interesting to do ?

  12. Re:Or you agreed w/ everything but the last senten by Stonehand · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You're claiming that this would -reduce- gun crime.

    In practice, it might mean that those who kept their firearms might feel safer threatening those who hadn't. In addition, firearms usually provide one sort of means, not a motive; if you're killed by poison or knife, you're still just as dead.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  13. PARENT NOT A FLAMEBAIT by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't know what retard modded my comment as "flamebait". I was just asking how is it a bad thing that honest citizens would not have guns.

    Can't we ask questions anymore on slashdot without some -nazis modding everything down because they don't agree?...

    --
    You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.