Slashdot Mirror


Comparison of Nine SATA RAID 5 Adapters

Robbedoeske writes "Tweakers.net has put online a comparison of nine Serial ATA RAID 5 adapters. Can the establishment counter the attack of the newcomers? Which of the contestants delivers the best performance, offers the best value for money and has the best featureset?"

4 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. Enjoying this by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When I see a link to such a great and extensive review and it's also from a small dutch tech news website, I feel proud to be dutch :)

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  2. Re:Comparison of Nine SATA RAID 5 Adapters by killmenow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    *cough* TROLL *cough*

  3. Re:Comparison of Nine SATA RAID 5 Adapters by swv3752 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Winmodems are not really modems. Have you compard the performance of a softmodem and a hardmodem?

    In anything less than ideal conditions, which means pretty much anywhere where broadband is not a viable option, softmodems suck. You'll be lucky to manage a 28.8k connection. Hook up a hardware modem and suddenly you get a 53k connection.

    But as for the software raid, what do you thinks happens in Windows? There is a driver that fools the config utils in Windows into thinking the array is one drive. What happens in Linux? There is a driver that allows one to setup a software raid and configure an array. So both Windows and Linux do the same thing but Linux is more honest about it.

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  4. Re:Drivers? by budgenator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    your post in Militants Planned Attack On Indian Software Firms (#11875966) Look, I know exactly two things about Indians: They stole our tech jobs and they constantly try to screw over hard working gambling-addicted Americans by building casinos on their reservations
    was the most clueless, stupid and racist thing I've ever had the privalage of modding flamebait -1 in many years!

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds