Stars Have a Weight Limit
Mike writes "Using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers made the first direct measurement within our Milky Way Galaxy, and concluded stars cannot get any larger than about 150 times the mass of our sun. The astronomers used the Hubble to probe the Arches cluster, the densest in our galaxy. This finding takes astronomers closer to understanding the complex star formation process. It also gives the strongest backing yet to the notion stars have a weight limit."
http://www.starjones.com/
Clearly Kirstie Alley is proving this false.
-Grant
|grant.henninger.name|
concluded stars cannot get any larger than about 150 times the mass of our sun.
Else they have to pay for two seats.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan
I think Anna Nichole smith has proved that one wrong. she hasn't lost weight, mearly collapsed in on herself
I am an engineer, I blame technology for my mistakes almost as much as I blame stupid people. -1190
It does NOT say that stars over 150 solar masses can't exist, only that the cluster is missing them. So, if the Anonymous Coward who walked off with them would own up, everything would be ok.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
Regarding the cluster that was studied:
"It resides 25,000 light-years away from Earth in our galaxy's hub"
Ahhh, it's an unswitched star topology network.
Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
It's a cross between Incoherent and Rant. That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
"Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
-- Nick Davies