Slashdot Mirror
Forbes Lists Top Corporate Hate Web Sites
windowpain writes "You've seen them. Maybe you've made one, like Walmart-blows.com or Paypalsucks.com. Now Forbes.com has a 'Special Report' devoted to what it considers the best of them. 'The following nine sites--there were ten, but one went unexpectedly dark during the editing of this story--are the crème de la crème of online rage. Note that we substantially cleaned up some of the posts, editing out odd capitulation schemes, iffy grammar and plain incoherence. Apparently blinding anger does not go hand in hand with dotting your i's and crossing your t's.' Maybe this will become an annual thing like the Forbes 400 and the Fortune 500." (I wonder what a capitulation scheme is.)
I'm surprised Best Buy Sux didn't make the list
A number of years ago I wrote an opinion in Epinions regarding a brand new Dodge truck I had purchased (the new ones in 1994 just after the redesign). The opinion was written after about four years of ownership. One week after writing the opinion I had a lawyer (presumably from Chrysler) call me and threaten libel. I replied all I wrote down were the facts. Nothing more and that I had all documentation to back up my claims. If he would like, I could create a website with all of the documentation. I never heard back, but it was that kind of treatment that unfortunately convinced me to never purchase another product from them again. it's too bad, because they do have some of the most exciting products out there, but they simply cannot build them reliably and their customer service (even at the supposed 5 star dealerships was atrocious).
Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
I'm surprised an anti-Dell site is not on the list.
The experiences I have had lately from Dell in getting hardware repairs made under service contract are some of the worst experiences I have ever had dealing with any company. And I've talked to a number of folks who have had similar experiences.
Ten years ago, Dell was one of my favorite companies.
Although, to be fair, a bunch of these companies have recurring issues.
Paypal, with its "we can suspend your account and you can't do fuckal about it, hooray, we get to keep your money". Allstate, with it's "musical chair claims adjusters".
Don't even get me started about UAL.
It isn't like people don't know about the shady shit these companies do, it happens pretty often, and if the company is a bunch of shits, contacting the BBB won't get you anywhere. State attorney generals haven't stepped in either in the cases of most of these companies.
I interviewed at UPS and we did a tour, a monitor fell off a conveyor belt. Everyone heard the tube pop, and the crash of glass, but one of the employees just tossed it back as if nothing had happened. As we were walking away, we heard another one drop and the sound of smashing glass.
Un-fucking-believable.
1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcf
I'm kind of disappointed that they didn't list Radio Shack Sucks. RSS was instrumental in organizing a class action against RadioShack, and in response RadioShack tried to lawyer them to death.
And it's actually company policy that anyone accessing it from work is to be terminated.
But it's over 5 years going strong on the (mycompany)sucks.com site...
"why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
In Canada, Canadian Tire actually bought out a corporate hate site that was really gathering steam - www.crappytire.com.
It was a real dilemma for them; buy it out and implicitly acknowledge that the site was pissing them off, or try to ignore the dreadful press that this guy was generating. They went with the former, though it must have hurt to have to register a nasty play on your corporation's name.
BTW, Canadian Tire is just awful - ask any Canadian.
Epinions is great and all, but it doesn't cover everything. What if I want to know which brand of salsa is the best? Or if Budweiser sucks as much as I hear it does? Or if Crest is better than Colgate?
Rateitall.com does that stuff, to an extent, but their site isn't as polished as it could be.
I want a site that categorizes every product under the sun by UPC and lets people comment on and rate them.
WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
So why isn't there a little sticker they can put next to the address: "Note, this package was accidentally dropped in shipping, please inspect it carefully. Our apologies for any damages." And the driver can live a little instruction sheet on how to file a claim (in this computer age it could be printed in the truck, and have all the tracking numbers on it already). You know they will have to do it, anyway, so you can at least make it as painless as you can.
Perfect no drop shipping is ideal, but accidents happen.
So, frustrated (and tired after switching everything over to our other DSL line), I posted a blog entry with the title "I hate CenturyTel" and a big explanation as to what went wrong. Monday morning, our DSL line was fixed. The engineers on the other end were VERY apologetic, but I just assumed that they were trying to make amends - when the next day we got a call in the office from an executive at CenturyTel who had Googled for "I hate CenturyTel", found my blog, and yelled at some people to get things fixed. He then called us to personally apologize, gave us a bunch of freebies to make amends, and chatted with my boss for over half an hour about how to avoid this problem ever recurring. I came in from a client, my boss said "we just got a call about your blog" - and I assumed I'd libelled someone, was in trouble, etc. He then said "make sure you politely insult everyone who screws us over, it did wonders this time!"
Lead developer, http://wisptools.net
That's because bonch, like a lot of others as of late, seem to think that 800,000+ people are only allowed one collective opinion about anything. That way, they can decry 'hypocrasy!!!!!!!' all day long.
I swear, he must have had 5 or 6 posts to that effect on the recent CherryOS story alone.
He's also notorious for decrying "Slashdot's" "anti-Microsoft bias". Over and over and over in some stories. Again, we're all one person here, apparently.
Textbook trolling, but like-minded moderators don't seem to catch on. It's more useful to those types to post and moderate up the same lines again and again, because they feel they've somehow stumbled upon some great hidden truth that must be exposed to the world.
Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
Don't blame somebody else for the "Slashdot only has one opinion" thing. That's built right into the system. Have you looked at the way comment moderation works around here? Comments that don't toe the party line are moderated down until they get filtered right off the page.
Also, I don't think you know what "troll" means. Hint: It doesn't mean "he keeps saying something I disagree with, which infuriates me because I am disinclined to tolerate opinions which differ from my own."