Slashdot Mirror


Apple Backs Blu-ray

zaxios writes "The New York Times is reporting that Apple has joined the Blu-ray Disc Association, and will use Blu-ray in upcoming versions of iMovie and Final Cut. The move puts Apple among Sony, Matsushita, Dell, HP and Walt Disney in supporting Blu-ray; companies including Toshiba, NEC, Warner Brothers, New Line Cinema, Universal and Paramount are pledged to adopt the competing HD-DVD format. Apple's support confirms Blu-ray's future dominance on the desktop, but the division in Hollywood and notebook manufacturers between the two HD videodiscs will ensure the bona fide format war we were all secretly pining for."

25 of 491 comments (clear)

  1. Matsushita. by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apple among Sony, Matsushita, Dell, HP and Walt Disney

    For those of you that don't recognize the name "Matsushita", they're probably known to you as Panasonic.

    1. Re:Matsushita. by Troed · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... and JVC makes Blueray-discs that have a normal DVD layer as well and can be read in normal DVD-players. Backwards compatible manufacturing exists for HD-DVD as well, but until quite recently it didn't for Blueray, which was seen as negative.

      link

  2. Indeed by goldcd · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://search.microsoft.com/search/results.aspx?st =b&na=88&View=en-us&qu=bluray results = 0

  3. Re:Dell by static0verdrive · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dell is backing Blu-ray... RTA

    --
    ========
    77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
  4. Apple as an indicator of future dominance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Shall we review some of the technology apple backed before it got big on the desktop?

    Apple's decision to ship USB on the iMac marked the start of USB as a consumer interface.

    Ditto for firewire, floppy-less machines.

    And what's MS gonna do with HD-DVD? Ship computers with it? Disable Blu-Ray drives? E-THIS-FORMAT-SUCKS: ?

    1. Re:Apple as an indicator of future dominance. by Spencerian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Incorrect. Apple chose DVD-R, the typical format most used in all burners on all platforms when the DVD burn thing began becoming available for computers in a barely affordable way around 2001. The DVD+RW format never really took hold anywhere. Some PC makers used DVD+RWs that Apple systems couldn't read.

      Today, Apple places DVD-RW drives in pro desktops and laptops. I don't know if that helps with +RW disc reading.

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    2. Re:Apple as an indicator of future dominance. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, YOU'RE incorrect. We have several DVD-RAM equipped Macs here being used as Avid platforms. Not a bad format, but the media is slow and hugely expensive by modern standards.

      The first DVD-R/RW equipped Mac was the DA 733 G4 about 18 months after the DVD-RAM equipped machines appeared.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Apple as an indicator of future dominance. by mr+i+want+to+go+home · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair - there was a time when ALL you could get for computers was DVD-RAM drives. I can't remember if this was a technical limitation, or a move of the DVD consortium to separate computer formats from video (ie to stop piracy).

    4. Re:Apple as an indicator of future dominance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually today Apple places DVD+/-RW drives in desktops and laptops.

      Full support for + is a recent development in OS + apps, but the drives themselves have been based on +/- mechanisms for some time -- software support of the format was the major hurdle that needed to be overcome.

      FWIW, as I recall, +RW had the major drawback of having a very opaque media, moreso than -RW, which itself is much darker than +R/-R. That low of a reflection caused a lot of drives to not work with it.

  5. Re:Sucks to be an early adopter by nutshell42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PS3 will use Blu-Ray. That means prices will begin to fall mid-2006 (when it's released in Japan)

    --
    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  6. Re:don't forget the MiniDisc! by madprof · · Score: 2, Informative

    When they said ATRAC they meant MiniDisc. ATRAC is the data format used on MD....

  7. Re:The cheap one wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Apple only started supporting DVD+R from January this year. Previously, they had been DVD-R only.

  8. I'm sorry, you have a basic fact wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple has only ever supported DVD-R for recording.

    Now that DVD+/-R recorders have been out for 2 year, Apple is still pushing just the -R.

    I know, I just bought an iMac G5 last month, and annoyingly, you have to buy blank -R's, not the more common and popular +R's.

  9. Re:It doesn't matter by zaxios · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please stop spreading misinformation. HD-DVDs won't play on "the current installed base of DVD players." HD-DVDs and Blu-ray Discs are read with lasers at 405 nm; DVDs use lasers at 650 nm. Nevertheless both HD-DVD and Blu-ray drives can be made fully backwards compatible with DVDs.

  10. Re:And that is why... by justforaday · · Score: 4, Informative

    I seem to remember USB already being established in the PC universe when the iMac first came out. As I recall, Jobs incorporated USB because he wanted all the same cool devices available for the PC to also be usable on the Mac (with the suitable application of proper drivers, which cost little to produce).

    Apple was not the first to incorporate USB ports on their computers, that much is correct. However, until Apple introduced the iMac and essentially forced USB on their users, there were very very very few actual USB devices available. It was only after the iMac came out that you could begin finding USB devices in your typical computer store.

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  11. Re:And that is why... by hey! · · Score: 3, Informative
    Well, no. I'd had PCs years before the iMac that had USB ports. Of course there was nothing to plug into the them.


    The iMac was the first PC that shipped where you had to use USB because there was no other way to connect a mouse and keyboard.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  12. Apple snubbing MPEG4 by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Almost every media standard Apple had backed early has succeeded overall in the market. Ones that Apple snubbed (or where it has been snubbed e.g. MPEG4) have had real problems getting established, and have mostly failed.

    Since when is Apple snubbing, or being snubbed by, MPEG4?

  13. Re:Not really... by INeededALogin · · Score: 2, Informative

    MPEG2 has trouble catching on?!? Just because you don't use it in your computer "piracy" world does not mean that it is not used. MPEG2 is used across the country for any real video work because it is basically uncompressed. This means News stations, Cable Stations etc...

    I know for a fact that Local and National commercials across the nation are encoded in MPEG2. Also, that most of the News clips that you see on TV are sitting on a video content server as an MPEG2 stream. MPEG2 has a whole plethora of hardware vendors that make nothing but MPEG2 Encoders and Decoders so how exactly is it having trouble catching on?

  14. Re:And that is why... by INeededALogin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Firewire never gained more of the market share over USB, and that is why all DVDs use MPEG4.

    sigh...

    Firewire is to multimedia as USB is to keyboards.

    Seriously, Different purposes and it is the same reason that Firewire is part of every camcorder shipped today and USB is part of just about every keyboard or mouse shipped today. You could say that the floppy drive is one of the most successful devices in history because it shipped unchanged for so long, but that doesn't mean that you can use it instead of a hard-drive.

    All DVDs use MPEG4? WRONG. MPEG2 is the standard DVD codec. While many newer DVD Players may support new formats such as MPEG4 or DiVX, studio productions are rarely encoded in these since they need the disk to play everywhere. Don't believe me about MPEG2... Look here. That is the first link I found to it, but it technically is the DVD FAQ that every site backs.

  15. Re:It doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I hate to break it to you, but Blu-ray actually does it one better by allowing dual-layer DVDs on the same disc. (The HD-DVD versions only have the 4.7gb) http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000917024829/

    HD-DVD pretty much has zero advantages at this point.

  16. Re:Not really... by Monkey+Angst · · Score: 2, Informative
    No two coutries with a McDonald's in them have ever gone to war.
    Yet, does anyone seriously claim that McDonald's has that much control over world events?

    Yes and no. Thomas Friedman, I believe, put forth that idea years ago... but later admitted that it isn't true (after all, 19 McDonalds-laden NATO members bombed the crap out of Serbia, which has McDonalds). Interesting idea, Tom, but doesn't really pan out.

    You are right that he wasn't saying that the presence of McDonalds prevented war between countries. It was, however, Friedman's thesis that the factors that led these countries to get a McDonalds did have an effect on whether they became embroiled in international conflict. Which is much more sound reasoning. He was just wrong, is all.

    --
    stripShow - Where WordPress meets webcomics
  17. Re:My Concern Either Way is: by JawzX · · Score: 2, Informative

    Same problem with these as with those "disc stabilizer ring" snake-oil they used to sell...

    Despite standards, not all discs are EXACTLY the same size, fit is variable. Ever used a disc stabilizer ring? I did once. Put a stabilized audio disc in my 40x read CD drive, the ring blew apart under centrifugal stress and jammed the drive. Had to dissasemble it to get the disc out. Luckily no damage to the drive, but what a PAIN IN THE ASS. These things use the same sort of plasti-rubber rings to hold them on. I don't trust 'em. Good idea, but execution leaves much to be desired.

    There are some "industrial" solutions out there that I have seen marketed to video rental stores. Same basic idea, thin plastic sheet; but these things use adhesive to stick them to the disk at the edges and center. Again, centrifugal force from high-speed drives will stretch the plastic and cause them to blow apart eventualy. If the plastic should actualy be scratched badly enough to tear it, they then disintegrate all over the inside of your drive. I've seen it happen. It's messy. Not to mention the residual adhesive gunk on your disc and the difficulty of putting them on perfectly straight. Even with one of those centering jigs they never quite hit the right place. Then there's always the catch of a label-side scratch, Good-bye media.

    I still advocate caddies (or diamond coating *grin*) as the only real solution for people who don't want to bother handling discs with extreme care.

    I love my Skip Dr. and wouldn't trade it for a case of disc protectors, but it sure would be nice to just not have to worry.

  18. Re:HD-DVD will win out by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Video professionals STILL use Beta."

    They use Betacam, not Betamax. It's a different format.

  19. Re:Not really... by NoData · · Score: 4, Informative

    MPEG2 is used across the country for any real video work because it is basically uncompressed

    What are you talking about? MPEG-2 video is usually compressed somewhere between 8:1 and 30:1. And nobody uses it for (serious) editing. Video is often distributed in MPEG-2 just because there is a very good quality to compression ratio. It's portable, and fits on DVDs because it's compressed.

  20. Supported formats--why not DV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sidenote is neither HD-DVD nor Blu-Ray support the DV format as an official video format, which means joe public still has to go through the hassle of transcoding DV to MPEG2/WMV/H.264 to play home movies. Isn't the world tired of making ugly compressions of compressions yet?

    Such a shame given a Blu-Ray disc should be able to hold a couple hours of DV video.

    Same is true on the other end of the spectrum. If you have low quality MPEG4 files or H.263 files you have to transcode them to MPEG2/WMV/H.264 as well. Again a compression of a compression.

    Why can't these video formats specify the cumulative sum of all major codecs invented at the time of the format? Is it really that hard to mandate ffmpeg in the Blu-Ray spec instead of a proprietary Microsoft WMV codec?