Slashdot Mirror


Apple's Dev. Tools Hint @ Dual-core G5 & Quad Mac

Eug writes "Apple just released a new version of its CHUD tools, which provides clues about dual-core G5s and quad core Macs (dual dual-core). The clues include a reference to the 970MP, which is dual-core G5 with increased L2 cache. Also, there is now support for 4 CPUs, whereas previous versions of these Mac OS X tools only supported 2. This likely means we'll see dual-core Macs by WWDC, and possibly quad Macs based off these dual-core chips by then too."

8 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Why rumors? by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting


    So, while it is interesting to speculate on what Apple may be doing and where they may be going with various products, I have never really understood the rabid nature of the fan sites and rumor sites. What is the point with rumors? Can anybody explain that to me?

    I am going to be practical here: It has always amazed me that people say "I am going to wait to buy XXXX until they come out with the new one". Buy what you need for the job you need it for and realize that whenever you buy something computer related, it is likely already obsolete and will be replaced with the next shiny thing in a couple of months. There are very few times where waiting will recoup your investment. Get what you need for the job and start being productive now. If something comes out that will make you more productive, then sell off the previous system and get the new one if 1) it will pay off the investment or I suppose, 2) if you simply like shiny things.

    Don't get me wrong. Apple builds some sexy hardware and software, but I prefer to use their stuff for my work and research because it simply allows more productivity and is more pleasurable to work with, but somebody, please explain to me why the rumor sites are so popular? I understand why business analysts might be interested, and competitors, buy why the obsession of fans with these rumors?

    Oh, and is not it time for the Slashdot Apple desktop icon to be updated to reflect the current desktop line? i.e. G5.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Why rumors? by revscat · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, while it is interesting to speculate on what Apple may be doing and where they may be going with various products, I have never really understood the rabid nature of the fan sites and rumor sites. What is the point with rumors? Can anybody explain that to me?

      Dude, if the though of not one but TWO dual-core 64-bit processors sitting on your desk doesn't get you engorged and/or moist, then it is simply impossible for you to call yourself a geek in good standing.

      Two 64-bit *multi gigahertz* dual core CPUs. On your desktop. Running OS X.

      *shifts in chair*

      Yup, I'm in the in crowd. Kickin.

    2. Re:Why rumors? by javaxman · · Score: 5, Insightful
      why the obsession of fans with these rumors?

      Why do bored housewives care about what was on Paris Hilton's handheld ? Why is Michael Jackson's trial big news ? Who are Brad and Jen and why do so many people care?? How many people read US Weekly?!?

      God help us, I don't know why, but reading tech rumor sites is the geek equivalent, what's so hard to understand? It beats doing actual work... I don't care what happens to hollywood celebs, and politics is just painful to watch, so reading up on my favorite tech is great entertainment. Probably a lot of the folks reading these sites are checking CNet and /. and google news as well. I know I am.

      But by any standard, Apple is one of the more interesting tech companies out there, definitely one of the more unique ones, so it really shouldn't be hard for you to see why it's so popular as a rumor subject. Almost nobody is really checking rumor sites to make purchasing decisions. It's just our form of US Weekly.

      is not it time for the Slashdot Apple desktop icon to be updated to reflect the current desktop line? i.e. G5.

      Is that really the thing /. needs to work on the most?? I'm sure there are more important features of the site that could use some attention... but most important of all, what should the icon be? A G5 PowerMac? A Mac mini? A G5 iMac? An Xserve? I guess it should be a G5 PowerMac, but a Mac mini or G5 iMac might be the more common machine...

  2. Quad Mac by zosa · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...will they call it a Quadra? ;)

    1. Re:Quad Mac by The+Iconoclast · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your puns mean Newton to me! Can you Copeland with the horrible puns iMacing?

      --
      Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
  3. Re:Dichotomy by BWJones · · Score: 5, Informative


    I can't help thinking that this is bad timing on Think-Secret's part. To raise your profile by doing (again!)

    The reason is that Nick Ciarelli is making beaucoup cash from Think Secret. It has been a cash cow for him.

    On the other hand, there's the case that if he's not doing anything wrong, why not continue doing exactly that.

    The blog world is having a field day with this case but the reality is that Apple is not trying to limit what blogs report, and they do not consider Think Secret to be a blog site. It is a rumor site that has broken the law by soliciting confidential information and compensating those who choose to divulge confidential proprietary information. Good write up on the reality here.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  4. Slashdot's New Title by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rumors for Nerds!
    Stuff that may or may not be true!

  5. the IIfx effect by Selecter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Way back when, Apple came out with the IIfx, described as "wicked fast" by Jobs. They cost 10,000 dollars in 1993 dollars, but they sold plenty of them.

    I am convinced thay have missed the boat until now. They need to make a PC crusher at the top of their line, something that is so much faster than any PC for creative work that no one would dare say any PC is faster.

    They got a lot of attention and doubting when they introed "The World's Fastest Personal Computer" when they came out with the G5. What they need to do is actually make that come true beyond anyone's doubt, and then keep up with it. To hell with what it costs - if they sold those IIfx's for 10K back in 1993 they can do the same thing today but even better for far less money.

    This time, make that boast true, and shove it straight down the naysayers throats.