Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.4 Released

andy753421 links to today's announcement of the official release of KDE 3.4, and writes "Several KDE 3.4 based distributions such as ArkLinux and Kubuntu are soon to follow. Features in the release include built in Text to Speech, a revamped trash system, enhanced PDF support and PC to PC synchronization, as well as a new theme. KDE 3.4 weights in at 6,500+ bug fixes, 1,700+ enhancements, and a grand total of 80,000+ contributions." Reader gotr00t adds a link to the KDE download mirror page . Update: 03/16 20:58 GMT by T : mrevell points out an interview with KDE hacker Aaron Seigo in the latest LugRadio, in which Seigo "dispels various myths about KDE and talks about the desktop environment's future."

12 of 454 comments (clear)

  1. Screenshots by Grip3n · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
    1. Re:Screenshots by trans_err · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's another from kubuntu with KDE 3.4 and default transparency options
      Pretty, eh?

  2. Re:One more stat by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  3. Re:fat as ever? by m50d · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually it performs better with every x.y release, although the new features will weigh against that for real speed. But they're taking a breath ready to make KDE 4 the most bloaty ever. (Disclaimer: I'm actually a KDE fan, I do know qt4 brings a lot of speed improvements, but I also expect this to be true at least of the 4.0 release)

    --
    I am trolling
  4. Re:BSD? Huh? by spektr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Try reloading the frontpage several times. The category will change between BSD and Linux randomly.

  5. Re:BSD? Huh? by timothy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Call me ignorant, but what does KDE have to do with BSD?

    Mr. Helmet:

    Well, KDE has about as much to do with BSD as it does with Linux :) Popular desktop on both.

    My intent was to make it basically in the Linux section (since many more KDE users are using Linux -- I assert, without numbers, just observation, and I could be wrong, and a moose once bit my sister and and and), cross-listed in the BSD section.

    A peculiarity of the Slashdot backend means I picked the wrong order / weighting for KDE vs. Linux; I updated the story to fix this. No slight is meant toward Linux users, BSD users, Gnome users, those who enjoy boiled eggs with dill of a winter evening ...

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  6. Re:awesome by Carewolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Neither does KDE. We have around 800 developers with 100 commits each on average. Although fairly it is mostly 200 core developers with 100s of commits. Check CIA/a.

  7. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by avalys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First of all, that thing has been there since KDE 1.0. It's a toy, and I doubt it requires much maintenance, so why not leave it in? What do you expect from something in the "kdetoys" package, anyway?

    Second, the current moon phase is very important for amateur astronomers. A full moon makes it nearly impossible to see anything but the brightest objects in the sky, because of the glare. Also, if you want to look at the moon itself, the best time is not when it's full (because everything is so bright and washed out), but when it's at approximately 1/2 phase, because the shadows show depth.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  8. Good news by realmolo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to say, KDE is starting to get really good. And they seem to be cranking out improvements faster than they did in past years.

    A couple more versions, and they'll probably have caught up to/surpassed what you get with a Mac or XP system. GUI-wise, anyway. Underneath it's already better.

    The only complaint I really have about Linux on the desktop these days is the confusing layout of the filesystem. Which isn't KDE's fault. I hate having programs located in 5 different directories, with their configuration files in yet ANOTHER directory. I'm used to it, and it makes sense in a way. But I'd like to see all non-OS exectuables in their own folder under one "Program Files" folder, along with their configuration files. All the "system" files could go under a "System" folder.

    But that'll never happen. It would break EVERYTHING.

  9. Re:Yahoo :) by bigjocker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sadly, about a month ago I gave up on KDE and Gnome and went back to Enlightenment. I have over 1GB RAM, but those desktops are becoming a huge memory hog.

    E just sits there (looking beautiful, BTW) and does just what I need. A few tweaks away and I have a great desktop.

    --
    Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos. What you do today, might burn your ass tomorrow.
  10. Now watch the bug reports roll in. by Kili · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm on the kmail list and in the past 12 hours over 57 bugs have been filed against kmail alone...

    I think I'll do what I usually do... wait for x.1 to be released. If that comes out too quickly I wait for x.2.

    As always: Back up your data BEFORE trying new software.

    Happy compiling...

  11. Re:Klauncher could not be reached via dcop by nietsch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    " kde needs to fix this problem, not a workaround. Not for me because I don't care anymore. For others, especially newbies."

    Yes and the catholics need to love the protestants, and the linux need to fix their installion scripts.

    If you cannot even mention the distro/version you were running and how you got kde on it, why should anybody take you serious. You are just trying to get people to get angry at you for being hardheaded.

    And I will bite your head off.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you