Slashdot Mirror


Game Developers Unionize?

Gamasutra.com has a look at the reasons, both pro and con, for unionization of the folks behind the entertainment software industry. From the article: "Many industry observers see close parallels between the gripes of today's game developers and those of workers in the movie industry in the 1930s and '40s, particularly in the animation segment. The difference is that Hollywood unionized, and the game industry is still only talking about it."

12 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Outsourcing. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The difference is outsourcing. The game industry can pretty much outsource everyone. Hollywood can't: if they outsourced everything, it would become Bollywood, and there is already a Bollywood.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Outsourcing. by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful
      They certainly can! I mean, games are a prime example of the type of stuff that can be outsourced to a group of generic coders, as opposed to developed by a hand picked team of people with specific skills in specific areas. Games, by and large:
      • Are written in collaborative languages like COBOL, C#, and Java
      • Require little or optimization
      • Require no imagination or development of new ideas. Games are usually simple black boxes, easily spec'd, with no unusual programming techniques required
      • Require no specialized art beyond simple UI icons and existing corporate logos
      • Whoever heard of a game with audio? Only programmers need to be involved in the development of new games
      • Require similar skillsets amongst all developers. A programmer working on one aspect of a game's design is almost certainly suited to developing every other part. So different programmers can be swapped in and out of development as needed, and to increase development speed, all you have to do is throw in more programmers
      I've used a wide variety of games in my time. Most, of course, were bespoke, developed for specific giant corporations, to manage their payrolls for example, or online ordering systems. Just because greedy people like John Carmack have made their millions through automated bank statement printers (thanks Carmack's "Quake 3 Arena" for our outrageous banking fees!) and supermarket inventory control systems, doesn't mean we need people like them developing the next generation

      So don't tell me that you can't out-source games development! It's just a matter of firing everyone and sending the specs of any new games you need developed to an outside agency.

      (Yes, it's sarcasm)

      (Yes, I'm aware there's probably a lot of talented people all over the world. But that's not what outsourcing is. Outsourcing is about making use of shared pools of programmers operating according to specs that have travelled half way around the world, who can program more cheaply than the people they're replacing. If a job requires talent, that's not possible. You can, obviously, open an EA office in India and headhunt the best hardware hackers, artists, etc, but that's not exactly something you can do overnight.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  2. A couple cons by Max_Abernethy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't want to totally diss this idea, but I wanted to point out a couple of problems I see with it: Unions have the potential to stifle creativity. If union rules require that everything gets made with union workers, suddenly it becomes a lot harder for low-budget, independent studios to operate. There's also the fact that unions tend to enforce seniority a little too much. I realize it might seem silly to talk about at a time when people are quitting before they get old enough to be fired for being paid too much, but if that were to change, you suddenly have the issue of age being weighted over merit in company hierarchies.

  3. Good idea by Red+Moose · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It would probably be a good idea but this seems a pervasive element to modern America's future. The pressure is on to cut custs as it's a quick-n-dirty way to boost profits so looks good on portfolios for investors.

    But the backlash is that although outsourcing can stem rising wage costs, you need to keep that group in jobs to buy the shit your company churns out. As a whole, the greed is simply going to voerpower the likes of EA, etc., .

    Now, I'm not even in America so my knowledge of US workers is based solely on Slashdot and The Onion, but even I can see that perhaps nationally agreed minimum contracts negotitated by unions for various professions like games programmers, etc., would help.

    They can outsource some of the people some of the time, but they can't outsource *all* the people *all* the time. WOuld they simply be prepared to shut up shop and move base to Mumbai? I don't think the corporate big wigs would appreciate that one bit.

    --

    Acting stupid isn't much fun when there's someone around who knows better

    1. Re:Good idea by servognome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now, I'm not even in America so my knowledge of US workers is based solely on Slashdot and The Onion, but even I can see that perhaps nationally agreed minimum contracts negotitated by unions for various professions like games programmers, etc., would help.
      The problem is unions, like almost any other body, looks after itself first. Extra clauses get included in the contract negotiations, things like:
      * Artificial Requirements - a union programmer must have a degree from a 4 year university with a 2 year apprenticeship, to limit the available workforce to artificially increase wages.
      * Artificial job titles - Only a person with 15 years of experience can be a senior programmer, to keep older union guys employed
      * Artificial Work Requirements - Any released product (no matter if it is an expansion pack, port, or an entirely new game) must have at least - 1 Sr. Level editor, 1 Sr. Artist, 1 Artist, 1 Sr. Game Designers, 1 Sr. Engine Developer, 2 Sr. Programmers, etc. to ensure continued employment of the union workers.
      Unions work to the benifit of their members, sometimes at the expense of the industry itself.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  4. Actually by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, I think the end result will be new developments in RPG-style fantasy games. You will go into a dungeon and find Teamsters-member goblins lounging against the walls, refusing to lift a finger to fight you. Entire levels of games will be replaced with big red "UNFAIR! ON STRIKE" messages blocking entry. Fighting the boss of a level will become even more fun: no more swords and shark guns. Now, you will fight the boss through mass demonstration and labor action.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  5. About time by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People have come to this comclusion many times before, it's time somebody actually starts acting.

    Don't fear outsourcing. Saying "we can't demand better work conditions because they'd outsource us" makes you a slave at the mercy of your master. Fact is that your work conditions are so bad they almost violate international right, if you believe you'll lose your job if you try to improve them you'll work at those inhuman conditions until you die or get outsourced anyway. The whole fear thing is exploited by companies which is a reason I demand anyone who wants to abolish job security is considered a public enemy. Job security is the only thing stopping corporations from blackmailing their employees into working inhuman hours in order to keep their jobs (or even falsify timesheets!). Unions provide job security since they counteract the idea that you can replace anyone demanding humane treatment with a new drone that won't complain for a few years.

    As long as someone is willing to do the job there will be work. Even if all dev houses outsource to India or Russia you'll see new devs using local devs pop up. Since the big studios would no longer be siphoning up the best workers and the smaller companies will more likely attemp to fight with innovative ideas and fresh games instead of trying to make graphics that can compete with some 200MUSD game we might even see the rebirth of the industry. But seriously, it won't come that far.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  6. How about a game PLAYERS union? by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 4, Funny
    I propose we form a union for gamers. Here are our demands:
    1. A standard 8 hour gaming day
    2. 15 minute breaks every three hours for Red Bull and Doritos.
    3. Workman's comp for carpal tunnel syndrome
    4. Dental plan.

    I say we all go on strike until these demands are met. Gamers of the world, UNITE!
  7. Re:Yet, they lose political rights. by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The other side of the coin is: if you're an employer, and you don't like unions, don't give your employees any reason to join one.

    BTW, the laziness you cite is common throughout the industry, it's just anti-union kooks notice it more with unionized companies. One of the most absurdly anti-union companies in the US at the moment is Wal*Mart.

    Tell us what you think about the average Wal*Mart employee's attitude to work.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  8. Stay Away... by lbmouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure, lets have the unions do for software industry what they did for the American auto, steel, & textile industries.

    Aren't we outsourcing enough jobs?

  9. Unions go against job security by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "Unions provide job security since they counteract the..."

    In real practice, however, unions reduce job security. When the company has to pay everyone more, they have to get rid of workers to make up for it (the money has to come from somewhere), and the company's workforce undergoes reduction.

    A good example of this is the famous Teamster's strike at UPS just a few years ago. The Teamsters won their wage demands, and the size of the UPS workforce was reduced in order to pay it.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  10. LOL OMG by UES · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm laughing my ass off at all the posters who claim Unionization would destroy the creative industries.

    There are few industries as unionized as the Motion Picture Business. Yet, it seems to be responsive to market demands and changing technology, profitable, and a world leader in its field. And it remains headquartered in California.

    Any by Unionized, I mean UNIONIZED. Pick any major Hollywood release at random. I would wager that:

    - The writer is a union member (Writers Guild of America).

    - The director is a union worker (Director's Guild of America).

    - The stars and most of the actors are union members (Screen Actors Guild).

    - The cinematographer is a union member (American Society of Cinematographers).

    - All the electricians, carpenters, truckers, and other construction and transportation personnel are unionized.

    - Stunt personnel are unionized.

    Are there non-union productions? Yes, sometimes. But the understanding in the industry is that the majority of work goes to union members. The major players all deal with the unions.

    BTW, guess which country has the strongest Auto Worker union. Yeah, Japan. Perhaps American auto companies are less competitive for other reasons.