EU Sleuths Think Microsoft Sabotaged Windows
Adam Zweimiller writes "The Inquirer is reporting that in it's ongoing battle with Microsoft, the European Commission is investigating the possibility that the Vole has sneakily sabotaged the Media Player-free versions of Windows it is obliged to ship to the EU. A report (subscription required) in today's Wall Street Journal suggests Microsoft has fiddled with the registry in its stripped-down Windows offerings and the result is that video clips embedded into Microsoft Word documents don't run properly, for example."
if I were Microsoft, I'd pull out of the EU market. It's insane how far the EU is going in this. I'd say, fine ... we're done. Enjoy, and walk away.
Oh Dear
.
Well you will run squishie windBloZe wont you Real works perfectly here and no unwanteds use a PROPER OS can the bloZe end your problems in an instant
Fred Quimbey
The fact that the parent post is modded Troll proves that Europeans in general are very thin-skinned.
The inability to handle simple criticism is the mark of a failing empire (or empires).
Europeans are a beaten people.
The EU wanted Microsoft to remove all video players from Windows. Now the EU is complaining that video doesn't play.
Oh, I get it. You guys are simply fucking with Microsoft. Sort of like a kid pulling the wings off a fly. Funny stuff your bureaucrats do over there!
If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
rabble rabble rabble, [insert anit-MS remark] rabble rabble, [point finger at MS]. Seriously tho, the MS is so evil conversations are getting old, how are "duuude MS is soo evil" topics modded "insightfull? it wasnt insightfull the first 5000 times it was on /.
In the other article we have a bunch of people kissing Steve Jobs' ass. In this one we have a bunch of people kissing Bill Gates' ass.
Depends on the DLL doesn't it? If for example the DLL couples a DOM and ECMAScript implementation to the oeprating system, in detriment to existing competing implementations, I'd say the judge is justified.
Yeah, but you're a kneejerk anti-Microsoft bigot and not a software developer.
You can't have it both ways - either they remove everything, and other apps break, and you complain that they're doing it to spite the judge, or they just remove the IExplore.exe shell and leave the rest in, don't break anything, and then they're in "unfair competition" with rival DLLs.
Clue for you: People used to sell TCPIP implementations for Windows. There were lots of "existing competing implementations". The idea of not having TCPIP built in today is ludicrous. But it flies in the face of your idea of "detrimental to existing competing implementations" - and a good thing too, because it's sound engineering practice, good for consumers, and is expected in a modern OS.
Coming soon - pyrogyra