Slashdot Mirror


Bang But No Splash

BishopBerkeley writes "When a drop of ethanol is dropped on a surface at low pressures (1/5 atmosphere or less), it makes no splash. Science offers a brief synopsis and fascinating pictures of the phenomenon. The results seem to confirm the (perhaps counterintuitive) prediction that more viscous liquids are more likely to splash, not less likely . Links to the researchers' home page at U of Chicago (as of now, the site is timing out) and pdf version of the article on arxiv can be found on the Science page also."

10 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. How would superfluids behave? by ram4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be interesting to investigate how superfluids behave.

    Since the article hints that the more viscosity, the lower the pressure must be to avoid splashing of the droplet, would superfluids (which have no viscosity at all) behave as expected even under the atmospheric pressure, or even a higher pressure?

    Offhand, why are they using ethanol and not water for their study though?

  2. Re:We know quarks, but not this... by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, to be fair to the upper crust Elizabethan gentleman scientists of yore, photography wouldn't be invented for another two hundred years, and high speed emulsions for some decades after that. Now those 20th century scientists -- thats a different kettle of fish.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  3. Here's the picture by hairykrishna · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The pdf link's a little slow and I'm sure people don't want to register for the article so I upped the image onto my website:

    http://www.hairykrishna.f2s.com/droplet.html

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  4. Re:a very interesting question... by rorrison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Off the top of my head... as the liquid is moving horizontally along the surface, it encounters air molecules, which causes the leading edge of the surface to pile up. As it piles up, it acquires the vertical component. Less air pressure -> less air molecules encountered -> less piling up -> less vertical component -> less splashing.

    Friction with the surface will slow down the liquid at the surface, but without the air resistance liquid not in contact with the surface just flows over the slower liquid at the surface and so doesn't pile up.

    Of course, IANAP, so this worth exactly what you paid for it. If, on the other hand, I happen to be right -- remember, you heard it here first!

  5. Simulations? by geordieboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What would be great is to check this phenomenon out with computer simulation. It might be tough to set up though, since you'd have to deal with a compressible gas phase and incompressible fluid phase, and keep track of the fluid surface to account for surface tension. I'm sure it could be done though. Axisymmetric simulation would probably be fine to start off.

    --
    The world is everything that is the case
  6. Re:Bad link by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The OP is probably at an institution where they have a site subscription to Science (most American universities worth their salt do, for example), so when they go to the link they get the article right away. If Hemos is somewhere that has a site subscription to Science, he'd get the same thing, and it would be a relatively subtle thing to figure out whether nonsubscribers can read the article or not.

  7. Re:We know quarks, but not this... by nameer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This one has me stumped:

    A small balloon is inflated in atmospheric pressure until it pops. The resulting fragments are a few large pieces of latex.

    A simmilar balloon is inflated by tying it off, placing it in a bell jar, and evacuating the jar. When the balloon pops, the result is a shredded mess of many small pieces of latex.

    The guy at the museum who showed this demonstration couldn't explain to me why it did this. He just kept saying, "It pops everywhere at once". Okay, but why?

    --
    "Uh... yeah, Brain, but where are we going to find rubber pants our size?" --Pinky
  8. Re:We know quarks, but not this... by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's one of those things that's utterly obvious--after the experiment is done.

    Given no a priori knowledge of this experiment, I could come up with convincing thought experiments and analogies to explain either possible outcome (low viscosity or high viscosity being less likely to splash).

    For example, what happens when a ball of soft putty drops on a surface? It definitely doesn't produce an apparent splash. The "intuitive" interpretation might be, then, that high viscosity liquids are less able to splash, based on our experience with a large, viscous semisolid.

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  9. Distorted Shape by LanceTaylor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I noticed that the drop that made the biggest splash was already distorted before impact. The drop that didn't make a splash was a perfect sphere up until the moment of impact.

    1. Re:Distorted Shape by Orp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      that is why raindrops have that famous teardrop shape

      NO! Large falling raindrops do not have a teardrop shape - they are flattened with the major axis roughly parallel with the ground - shaped more like a hamburger bun before they break apart. Friction with the air causes the drop to distort as you indicate and high pressure is found below the drop, low above it.

      --
      A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?