Scientists Weigh Smallest Mass Ever
PaSTE writes "From the article, 'US scientists have managed to measure the mass of a cluster of xenon atoms at just a few billionths of a trillionth of a gram - or a few zeptograms. The record measurement is in the mass range of individual protein molecules, and the detection was made using sensitive scales developed at Caltech.' Another big leap forward for nanotechnology."
This was posted on BBC on March 30.
This isn't the smallest mass ever measured, if it's anything it might be the smallest mass ever measured with something that's essientially mechanical. . ...
http://www.vetscite.org/publish/items/000305/
And what about physists who come up with masses for the fundamental particles??
Usually people use different tools when it comes to measuring things with masses in this range - a mass spectrometer for example
As for measuring really light things using the change in frequency of something that's vibrating that's not new
I think they mean DIRECTLY measured.
I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
Professor Roukes' homepage has a link to his earlier published paper on attogram mass detection (2004). The abstract mentions that mass sensing of individual molecules will be realizable with optimized NEMS devices. Also there is link to paper which discusses the ultimate limit to mass sensing based on NEMS. Needless to say that so far it is not the physics of these nanostructures but the extrinsic amplifier noise which limited the measurement.
In British English groups of people (organizations, corportations, etc.) are referred to in the plural.
Almost - it depends on the context:
"The Board is the highest decision-making body in the company."
and
"The Board are split on the issue."
See Economist Style Guide for the details.