Slashdot Mirror


Pentagon to Significantly Cut CS Research

GabrielF writes "Over the last few decades, DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has funded some of the most successful computer science research projects in history, such as the Internet. However, according to the New York Times, DARPA has recently decided to significantly cut funding of open-ended computer science research projects in favor of projects that will yield short-term military results. Leading computer scientists, such as David Patterson, the head of the ACM are outraged and worried."

11 of 408 comments (clear)

  1. excellent. by notque · · Score: 3, Funny

    This means they are going to use this money instead of fund the radically out of control social security right?

    It's in serious need... They should get to that.

    --
    http://use.perl.org
  2. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great! We didn't want to compete w/ India anyway...

    --
    [o]_O
  3. I guess someone important finally watched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    all 3 Terminator movies in a row and clued in after a night of hard thinking that "Skynet v0.8" was too suspiciouly named to continue to v1.0.

  4. This Totally Makes Sense... by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Funny

    With advances in communications technology, our Defense Department can outsource this sort of research to universities in countries where the cost is much lower. Countries like Iran, Yemen and North Korea are on the forefront of nuclear defense research, and would be happy to accept our funds for these sorts of purposes.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  5. Re:Well... by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny
    Well, like they say, it's killing the goose that lays the golden eggs. Maybe this move can get some new weapons system out there a few months earlier, but in the meantime, you're not inventing the technologies which permit whole new classes of weapons systems.

    I'll put it in StarCraft terms: you're spending your minerals on upgrading your Zealots, and failing to invest in the pylons and tech structures that would allow you to build a whole frickin' fleet of Protoss Carriers.

  6. Re:Does decent formatting mean nothing to you? by notque · · Score: 1, Funny

    You moderators ought to be ashamed of yourselves.

    DEAR GOD I KNOW

    Cause slashdot moderation is the most important thing in your daily lives.

    ASHAMED. COMPLETELY ASHAMED.

    AShamed - Feeling inferior, inadequate, or embarrassed

    You should feel inferior.

    Inadequate!

    EMBARRASSED!

    --
    http://use.perl.org
  7. Re:Does decent formatting mean nothing to you? by bcattwoo · · Score: 1, Funny
    Modding up to 5 a 15-second cut and paste post is simply ridiculous. You moderators ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
    Yeah with that karma boost AC posts are going to start off rated +2 now.
  8. Re:Twilight of the empire by lsmeg · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's no exaggeration to say that over 70% of all research students are foreign--simply because there are not many qualified US students. (It's a different story if we needed literature or communication students--we've got tons of those.)

    Id say were loosing on that front 2

    --
    It's OK! I'm a limo driver!
  9. Hey Dick, don't forget the eBay effect... by moocat2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't see how VP Cheney will allow this to happen. Without DARPA doing basic research, the Internet would not exist as we know it. And without the Internet, no eBay. And without eBay, our economy would truly be in the dumps.

  10. Behold the zealot rush by tbo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd always try to get Protoss carriers as fast as possible, but usually I got wiped out first by a zealot rush. Maybe your analogy is more apt than you realize.

  11. Just outsource the work to India by geekee · · Score: 2, Funny

    If we just outsource the work to India, the budget cuts can be absorbed without loss in productivity.

    --
    Vote for Pedro