Slashdot Mirror


NASA Schedules Robotic Spacecraft Launch

Nathan writes "NASA has finally set the launch date for their first robotic spacecraft, intended to "rendezvous in orbit with other satellites without any human intervention", to the 15th of April. The spacecraft, called "DART" as an acronym for "Demonstration of Autonomous Rendezvous", cost $110 million dollars and weighs 800 pounds."

8 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. Finally by majestiq · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Haven't the Russians been doing this for ages with their "Capsules"?

    1. Re:Finally by wingsofchai · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Soyuz space capsules have three seats, one for a tourist and two for the crew. So no. You're thinking of Progress, which is unmanned, but still controlled by humans from the ground.

      --
      Reading at high threshold levels is group-think.
  2. rendezvous without human intervention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like a rocket scientist's night out.

  3. Re:Why not rescue HST then? by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 5, Funny
    I wonder how many infrared telescopes build for the secret service are already monitoring us...

    You'd be surprised. Oh and please stop picking your nose and sit up straight. Sincerely, Department of Homeland Surveillance.

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  4. Re:I'm not sure why this is so significant by Sampizcat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yes, I think so actually. I'm starting to see the point... that no humans are involved.

    Think about this: What's the most expensive part of a space mission (apart from the launch)? Maintaining the humans on board once they're in space. Think about all the extra food, supplies, and all the space "wasted" on the astronauts. Imagine now if you could do away with them, and have machines do everything in space for you? Imagine if machines built the ISS? How much more space could be devoted to materials with each launch!

    And for those that scoff at the idea: Think of the mars rover. That was remotely controlled (correct me if I'm wrong). Why couldn't somebody remotely control a robot to perform a task? True, latency, but, a few seconds, depending on the altitude. Or even completely autonomously, as this article could lead to. Have a robot build a space station, all by itself - no human intervention whatsoever (not even relaying commands to ground control). Sounds pretty cool to me.

    Sampizcat

  5. NASA had to change the name by azaris · · Score: 4, Funny

    The original name was Lightweight Automated Weaponless Navigation Demonstration of Autonomous Rendezvous Technology, but for some reason they shortened it to DART.

  6. Because its not just a delivery vessel by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A few people mentioned Russian cargo ships and such but miss the point. Delivery of cargo is just one optional mission for this device. The main objective seems to be remote servicing of satellites. As of right now that work is done by people if at all, most of the time it is just cheaper to replace the satellite in question. It could also be employed on a quick launch basis to survey a shuttle or other craft that suffered possible damage during launch. How about take oxygen or similar to such a damaged craft until a rescue can be performed?

    There are many possibilities. Repairing the hubble would be outside of its domain as you would now need to design satellites with remote servicing as part of their design. This could open the door for more modular (generic) satellites. Besides opening the door for more nations to own them it creates new avenues for businesses in the future.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  7. If... by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it was completely autonomous, wouldn't it set its own launch date?

    --
    rewriting history since 2109