Slashdot Mirror


Google Adds Satellite Imagery to Maps

Ant writes "BetaNews reports that Google quietly updated its maps service late Monday to include satellite imagery, a first in the industry... Much of Google Maps remains the same - just with detailed pictures from high-tech satellites instead of standard map graphics. Maps can be dragged to view adjacent areas, which means users do not have click and wait for graphics to reload. Zooming is also instantaneous with the help of a slider placed atop the map." The resolution doesn't seem very high, but the integration is very seamless.

20 of 661 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like good technology for lots of uses by DeadSea · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Googles map software is pretty nifty. It seems like something that wouldn't be to hard to whip up for any large image file.

    I can imagine taking some very high resolution artwork and displaying it using this technology. I can zoom in to the max resolution or your can scroll around forever.

    Anybody have any software that would take a large image file and apply a google-map-like interface to it? The software should be something as simple as:

    1. Resize the image to various resolutions
    2. Break the images into 200x200 pixel chunks at each resolution and save those chunks as individual image files
    3. Put a javascript interface on

    If you are smart about your image naming conventions you shouldn't even need a powerful webserver. The whole thing could be served up via static files from a webserver with enough disk space and a big enough pipe.

    I'd like to see this for things like:

    • Local maps such as for state parks
    • Scanned artwork such as paintings - Like the Gigapixel Tapestries covered the other day.
    • Circular panorama photos that could be scrolled only in one direction

    --
    On-line Currency Exchange Rate Conversion Calculator

  2. Different dataset from Keyhole by willith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looks like, at least in parts, the imagery is from an older dataset than what's on the Keyhole service. I live in a large neighborhood that's been under construction for 3 years across the various sections, and there are more houses in the Keyhole dataset than on the Google Maps satellite images.

    No idea how much older, but it can't be more than a year or so.

    1. Re:Different dataset from Keyhole by garcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Looks like, at least in parts, the imagery is from an older dataset than what's on the Keyhole service. I live in a large neighborhood that's been under construction for 3 years across the various sections, and there are more houses in the Keyhole dataset than on the Google Maps satellite images.

      We were already talking about this this morning on our local geocaching assocation forum. Two of us (St. Paul and Apple Valley, MN) show that the images are at least 4 years old or newer.

      My house was built in 2001 and it shows it there. Google doesn't know my address and gives something nearby but I still can see the house :)

  3. Re:Erm by ishepherd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not really - try mousing over this map (hope the link works).

    --
    fud, notfud, yes, no, maybe
  4. Great fun with satellite imaginery by jokkebk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, even though I'm not american, the seamless scrolling makes the application superb way to waste time - zoom into a city, and just start scrolling along a road, and you never know where you are going to get!

    Rather nice if you want to plan a trip, too, as you get an idea how things look like along the way! And if the resolution gets better in distant future, who will need to do the actual trip anyway?

    If a service like this really becomes popular, it has vast potential - just zoom to where you are, and you can see all web sites in the area, plus visual hints on how to get there and how does the thing look like. Now if you only could link images taken from those places directly to maps..

    --
    http://codeandlife.com
  5. Re:Erm by TangoCharlie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Indeed you're right. Multimap has had aerial photos for a while... For example, this is where I live! The Aerial photos are actually provided by Getmapping.com. The aerial photos aren't available for all locations, but certianly most of the UK is covered.


    YMMV!
    --
    return 0; }
  6. Re:I do not see any change by Sinus0idal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    hmmm, I'm sure the whitehouse roof isn't quite that plain in real life :-)

  7. Re:Erm by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Try getting directions, then change to satellite view. Your route is still overlayed perfectly over the roads you need to take, even though the images are slightly different than the vector map.

    This is one of the coolest things I've ever seen. If it was possible to center the Google map based on lat/lon, just imagine how easy it would be to write a script that took input from your GPS and used it to scroll the map.

    --
    <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  8. Re:Not blocking? by biglig2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They've done something to the roofs of the neighbouring buildings (to the white house) as well...

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  9. Re:Erm by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Or until it shows Area 51, which I notice is conspicuously missing.

    --
    RST
  10. Re:varying seasons by Mignon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nice one. I thought it was cool that the shadows of the towers of the George Washington Bridge (New York City) were pointing in different directions. (Sorry I couldn't get a URL, so you'll have to search for it yourself. Try "178th and Broadway New York City" then scroll left a little.)

  11. Re:Example by follower-fillet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://mygmaps.com/ enables you to create, save and host custom data files and display them with Google Maps. It includes a standalone viewer so you can show your custom map on your site.

    --Phil.

  12. Re:Area 51? by BillBrasky · · Score: 4, Interesting
  13. High-interest targets obscurred? by Chappy01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Check this out, the US Capital Building congressional offices in Washington are totally obscured...
    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=constitution+ave+and +1st+street,washington,+dc&ll=38.891006,-77.008873 &spn=0.008444,0.010664&t=k&hl=en

    It's the same with KeyHole as well (screenshot):
    http://www.allbootdisks.com/images/keyhole.jpg

    Is keyhole doing this to all 'sensitive' targets?

  14. Re:More likely... by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Except that Aerial Ortho dataset was produced by the USGS and is public domain. Check out World Wind 1.3 for a smooth-scrolling, translatable, 3d globe that dynamically downlads any dataset you request and grabs higher res versions as you zoom in.

  15. Dates to mid-2002 at my house by Reziac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm looking at my house right now. A tree that was cut down early in 2003 is still there. A circular path started in summer 2002 (made by exercising a horse, so it's very visible) is also there. And by the amount of greenery here in the desert, and that our veggie garden had already died off, it is probably early in the dry season. So at least in my neighbourhood, the image appears to date from about July of 2002.

    The resolution is good enough that I can see the single stripe down the middle of a nearby two-lane highway. I can also see two cars and an 18-wheeler. The smallest visible object is a 4x8 sheet of plywood atop the shelter in my corral. I can also see my kennel concrete, which at that point is 15 feet wide, represented by 5 pixels on the saved image (you can pillage them via Moz's Page Info function). So there's the max resolution -- one pixel = about 3 feet (plus or minus some blurring).

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  16. Region of Waterloo -- 10cm Resolution by dmatos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Check this site:

    http://locator.region.waterloo.on.ca/

    (warning - I have only seen it work in IE).

    The region of Waterloo (ON, CAN) has aerial photography at 10cm resolution (~4in) in B&W for 2000 and 2003. I've been looking for a house, and this is a really great site for checking out the state of yards without visiting them. You can see trees, fences, the size of driveways, if the house is going to be in the shadow of an apartment building . . .

    I honestly have no issue with 10cm resolution being available to the general public. No tin foil on my head.

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  17. Re:Comeon, 1 meter per pixel.... by jmc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Good enough to see SR-71s parked on a tarmac:

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Kramer+Junction,CA&l l=34.952788,-117.884331&spn=0.006480,0.006738&t=k& hl=en

    Scroll east to see a huge compass rose painted in desert.

  18. Re:Come ON, Google! by BTWR · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I don't mean to be rude (honestly), but your comments sound exactly like Comic Book Guy in that Simpsons episode. He tells Bart how upset he is at an Itchy & Scratchy episode, how they have so let him down, and Bart asks "why are you complaining? They offer you something completely for free! who are YOU to complain?"



    Comic Book Guy's answer: "As a viewer, I feel they owe me."



    if you don't like the free service google offers, you said it yourself - mapquest already does it apparently. AND... it's 3 fewer letters to type in than maps.google.com. So there's your answer.