Developer Site CodeZoo Launches
acomj writes "Developer resource site CodeZoo launched today. An archive of Java code pieces, which plans to do for Java what cpan did for Perl, according to an announcement from O'Reilly." From the announcement: "We're not focused on hosting developer projects, like SourceForge, nor on comprehensively listing all open source Java code. Instead, we've hand-selected a list of the components we think will be the easiest and best to use in your development projects -- whether you are an open source or commercial developer."
Yes there are some warts, not all of the code in CPAN is perfect, some of it might very well be broken...but on the whole the repository has high quality code.
I would suspect every language/toolkit would want something like this.
Attempts to find genuineuley free re-targetable components has, only because of SUN, been much harder in Java than, say Perl.
Good luck.
I wonder how much documentation/community support CodeZoo is going to get. The reason things like the CPAN and CTAN work as well as they do is because of the enormous contributions from places like comp.text.tex, the TUG, and comp.lang.perl.*
There's enough code on the C?AN to make finding anything impossible without help.
After all, I am strangely colored.
It's the "Hand Picked" part of the description that's the problem.
Who needs a library which is censored by the librarians. Isn't it better to have a library consisting of *all* available applets/applications and have the user community rate them for quality and ease of use?
------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
Well usually there are publishers, editors and other to review what goes in a library.
Under your ideology you will never find what you are looking for because everyone is offering the same damned thing with their own creative touches, your better off writing the code from scratch then!
Right, because dependencies are unique to Perl.
CPAN handles that automatically, otherwise you'd either not be using the module or installng dependencies by hand. It's no different from apt-get.
That also neatly explains why those of us who have _not_ committed to a package based system do not want this...