Cooler Servers or Cooler Rooms?
mstansberry writes "Analysts, experts and engineers rumble over which is more important in curbing server heat issues; cooler rooms or cooler servers. And who will be the first vendor to bring water back into the data center?"
FO LIFE
first p0st! cheese ...but by the time my computer decides to send the p0st it won't be first... so...
fourth/fifth/sixth p0st!
water in server housings O_o much too dangerous ...
What makes sense is what solution is cheap and reliable.
On one hand, it should take much less juice to cool just a few boxen directly rather than keep an entire room cold enough to keep all those CPU cores cool as well.
On the other hand, high-performance cooling systems inside every box means a lot more points of failure.
On the other hand, if everything in your server room requires a working HVAC to function, you're in trouble if the HVAC goes out - while if the cooling system in one server goes out, you can just swap it with a backup server while you're waiting for repairs.
I'm sure there's a whole lot more pro/con that I could parrot if I had bothered to RTFA. . .
Finally, we can have a flamewar over something outside the computer realm. I say Aquafina is the best bottled water that can possibly ever exist. Fiji sucks donkey balls, and Arrowhead just tastes like dirt. And don't even get me started on Evian - that stuff will turn you gay.
Or should I have just posted: "I, for one, welcome our new aquatic overlords." ?
Would that be kelvin, Celsius or Fahrenheit?
[idge.net] windows, SUN or NetBSD poSts On survival prospects when IDC recently when IDC recently and shower. For series of exploding towels on the floor