Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Encarta Adopting Wikiesque Process

An anonymous reader writes "The MSN Encarta program manager announced that readers of Microsoft's encyclopedia articles can now edit articles in a Wikipedia-like fashion. Once submitted, edits are reviewed by Encarta staff members for accuracy, readability, and proofreading before being incorporated into the article." From the post: "To support this program, we've hired some new research editors. Their job will be to help you out with things like fact-checking, syntax, and editorial style. Every writer can use a good editor, and we see no reason that community contributors deserve any less." J adds: This won't be a big surprise, but "Your submissions to Encarta must be your own work" and "you grant Microsoft permission to use, copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, reproduce, edit, modify, translate and reformat your Submission."

3 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. Me Too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't imagine that this will actually work, I mean how many people submit/modify Wikipedia articles each day? It will be impossible for Microsoft's small (in comparison) payed staff to sift through hundreds, even thousands of changes, even if they use an automated filter to reduce the number of poor submissions. The page says a submission may take weeks before it appears, and I think this is being optimistic. In the end I question if this will even yield higher quality articles than Wikipedia, this just seems like Microsoft saying, hey look "me too!"

  2. Re:Can you criticize Microsoft on MS Encarta? by Orgazmus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An article, by Microsoft (or published by), criticizing Microsoft? I really dont think so.

    A community page that cant criticize itself and its creator(s), really dont have anything to do with being a community.
    This is just Microsoft wanting free articles.

    --
    The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
  3. Re:Pattern? by brontus3927 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The five stages of grief are
    • Denial
    • Anger
    • Bargaining
    • Depression
    • Acceptance
    I don't know that a business can be depressed in the emotional sense of the word, but I think Microsoft's strategy RE:Linux has fit this overall theme. I'd say MS is currently moving into the Barganing stage. Hopefully Acceptance won't be that far off. One /.er made a snide remark about a future with a MS Linux distro. The chances of that aren't great, but I would love to see it happen.

    Microsoft's inital position on Linux has been harsh, but do remember, Linux is 1)direct competition to Windows and 2)has a radically differnt philosophy that basically attacks the core of Microsoft's business model. How would anyone here feel if someone sprang up in direct competion to the way you live your life? How do any of us react to luddites and technophobes? Very similarly in spirit to MS's initial reaction to Linux.
    But the shock is starting to where off and Microsoft is realizing that Linux isn't going away. So their learning and changing.

    The changes in Encarta aren't just about embracing wiki. Microsoft's corporate buzzwords, the backbone of the feature set promoted in Office 2003 are integration and colaboration. Microsoft is simply extending that.