Slashdot Mirror


New Xbox Titles Through 2007

Despite the fact that the next generation of the Xbox console is expected out before the end of the year, via Evil Avatar a story stating that Microsoft is committed to the original Xbox through 2007. From the article: "A Microsoft spokeswoman told Reuters that 2007 is not a hard stop, but rather a guideline for the last releases of new games developed for the Xbox. Microsoft has not said whether its next console will be compatible with the current Xbox."

21 of 59 comments (clear)

  1. I think this is a sign of... by keeleysam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No backward comptibilty in the Xbox (2/Next), as this seems kind of early to state this, makes me think that high profile titles for Xbox may even come out after Xbox NExt comes out.

    Maybe they will even cross release games?

    --
    Nothing for you to see here, Please move along.
    1. Re:I think this is a sign of... by Headcase88 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dunno, to me it's the sign of the opposite; backward compatibility so non-Xbox owners are attracted to both the Xbox and Xbox2 games.

      But this is just a good step overall for them to make. Not everyone want to buy next-gen consoles as soon as they come out. They should sell a lot of games this way.

      But most AAA titles will probably be directed to selling XBox2s.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    2. Re:I think this is a sign of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rumours are that a large team is working on a cross compiler to recompile the top XBox titles. Updates will be available via broadband if you insert an original XBox title into the XBox2. Download can be stored on the memory cards of the XBox2. As they are based on SD Cards 1GB is less than $50 when its being released.

    3. Re:I think this is a sign of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the opposite, just look at the PSOne release schedule for 2000-2004. The PS2 is backwards compatible, and games continue to come out for both systems. Cross-releases continued to happen between Playstation consoles as recent as 6 months ago, although more of the PSOne releases are from EA Sports than anyone else in the last year or two.

      http://www.us.playstation.com/games.aspx?id=SLUS -0 1585
      http://www.us.playstation.com/games.aspx?id= SLUS-2 1051

  2. And also a sign of... by Iscariot_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And on top of that I'd also suspect this means the Xbox 360 hardware is going to cost a lot for quite a while... I'm thinking it'll take well over a year to go below $300.

    1. Re:And also a sign of... by __aailob1448 · · Score: 2, Insightful


      It would be a bad move for Microsoft to release their next console above the $299 mark. They need market share and they need it before the PS3 is released (which could happen anytime between march and november 2006).

      That means the Xbox has less than a year to take the advantage and convince enough gamers to buy it. This, combined with a pricedrop coinciding with Christmas 2006 may give it enough userbase to compete head to head with the PS3 when it is released because the PS3 *will* sell in huge numbers.

      And not just because of the name recognition and the hype surrounding the Cell processor but also because of the integrated BluRay drive. Remember how much of an incentive the DVD-playing capability of the PS2 proved to be back then.

    2. Re:And also a sign of... by cluke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, here's a newsflash for you : those companies aren't run by giant superbrains from the future, you know. They are run by people like you or I, and as people they are prone to stupid mistakes and wrong-headed decisions. They certainly do nothing to attain the papal-like air of infallibility you seem to grant them. (Just think of Enron or any of the innumerable failed business ventures of the last few years).

      And we ourselves as people are at least qualified to speculate on what they should or should not do. So yah boo sucks to you!

  3. Also notable in xbox news by Jicksta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This was just posted on Xbox-Scene.com too: Xbox 360 rumors.

  4. Re:Upgrade Cycle by Jicksta · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In two years, with Xbox support starting falling off, the Xbox homebrew scene will have had two years (from now) to have developed and refined their software.

    Since I'm pressed for time, I'll keep the list of interesting advancements brief:
    • XBox Media Center, already one of the most popular SF.net projects, will be by far the sweetest media suite for any platform.
    • Someone may port the Blackdown Java VM to the Xbox, allowing for any presently developed Java program to be ran on the exotic Xbox.
    • The OpenXDK may be just as functional as its official counterpart, allowing for LEGAL xbox homebrew development.
    • Add about a few dozen more fun homebrew games to the current selection.
    Granted, these are all ifs and maybes, but Xbox hacking will be here to stay, with or without Microsoft's support.
  5. Backwards-compatibility: more likely than not by gxw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider: Nintendo announced at the Game Developer's Conference in SF last month that the Nintendo Revolution (codename) will be backwards compatible with the GameCube...

    Consider: It has been previously confirmed that the PS3 will be backwards compatible: http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/09/02/ 1517232...

    Consider: development of XBOX software through at least 2007 provides opportunity for gateway games (like the new Zelda game that is coming out for the GameCube shortly before Revolution comes out; those that see the new Zelda on friend's GameCube may run out and purchase a Revolution to play it)...

    Consider: all of the hard drives in the original XBOXes will eventually fail, in a few short years -- guaranteed (moving parts and all). Which is easier to imagine: backwards compatibility, or repairing millions of old XBOXes?

    Imagine: the marketing nightmare that lack of XBOX backwards compatibility would generate, in face of the competition...

    The lack of a hard-drive is not a significant problem for backwards compatibility, but the lack of the white/black buttons on the new controller may be. While few games use them well, some games depend on them, including Bioware's Knights of the Old Republic. Perhaps backwards compatibility will require software updates/patches for the games?

    1. Re:Backwards-compatibility: more likely than not by gxw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Obviously the x86 can be emulated in software, just as VirtualPC does for Mac OS X and the PS2 does to support PSone games...

      Remember also, the XBOX uses a version of DirectX, which is a layer above hardware specifics inside the ATI or Nvidia chipsets.

      Creating an environment that will allow XBOX games to play on the Xenon will be a challege for Microsoft, but certainly not as hard as getting DirectX to work on all of the different video cards and proessors it has to run on for PCs...

    2. Re:Backwards-compatibility: more likely than not by Golias · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rubbish.

      Everybody talks about backwards compatibility like it will save (or kill) the second X-Box.

      If playing our old games on the new system was a priority, nobody would ever change platforms.

      Repeat: If playing our old games on the new system was a priority, nobody would ever change platforms.

      How many Sega owners looked at the PS2 and said, "hmmm... Grand Theft Auto 3 looks very cool, but the PS2 can't play my old Soul Calibur disk, so forget it"?

      Microsoft's success or failure with the new X-Box comes down to one thing and one thing only:

      If the flagship games they line up for it are good enough to be worth buying the console, people will buy the console. If not, they won't.

      The ability to play an old X-Box copy of Splinter Cell on it will make zero difference to anybody, apart from a few screaming know-it-alls on Internet chat forums.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  6. Re:Upgrade Cycle by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Informative

    well.. if you install linux on the baby.. why wouldn't you have java on the spot already _now_?(and without a real os at the back of things.. why would you want java anyways?)

    the big problem with legal xbox development is that you can't get it to run on the xbox without modding it.

    but looking on the bright side.. the current xboxes will be able to play nes games and other such emulators conviently to the foreseeable future way past the official lifespan of the xbox.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  7. Re:Upgrade Cycle by Jicksta · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a well-trainer xbox hacker, Gentoo Linux PC user, GentooX (Gentoo on Xbox) user, and Java developer, I believe I can speak with some merit here... :)

    "the big problem with legal xbox development is that you can't get it to run on the xbox without modding it."

    Actually, there are many "soft-mod" exploits in games such as MechAssault and 007: Agent Under Fire which allow you to boot unsigned code and ultimately flash your TSOP and EEPROM with a third party BIOS.

    Running GentooX for only interpreted code is really not worth it since an Xbox only has 64MB of RAM and a 733mhz Intel processor out of the box. A GentooX system would not only have to maintain the overhead of the interpreted language's runtime application, but also the WindowManager, its widget set, and any system services running such as apache, proftpd, smbd, webmin, and the system logging mechanism.

    Also, if you launch an Xbox distro from your dashboard, the linux kernel will need to use a virtual loopback device to mount the root partition. Because this is a loopback and not a physical extended partition, this also will cause a performance hit.

    If it were up to me to port a JRE to the Xbox, I'd probably write a menu launcher with a Xromwell backend that would execute a .Jar by booting a very minimalistic linux system with only the kernel, X server, alsa, network daemons, and JVM in memory.

  8. Re:Upgrade Cycle by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "It would seem that Microsoft thinks they can get people on the ole upgrade cycle just like they do for their other products.

    Whats next?

    XBOX 2006, XBOX.net 2007, XBOX.sp2 2008?"


    WTH are you talking about? There's at least 4 years between the XBOX and XBOX 2. In the mean time, they're saying "We'll continue to support the original XBOX for 6 years". This isn't good news for current XBOX users?

    Maybe I'm just really tired here, but the only reason I can figure that this was modded up is that there's some expectation that the XBOX will follow the Windows business model. Never mind that it hasn't done that in all the years it has been around. Never mind that it's a game console firmly established in a market with a 5 year life cycle. Never mind that game consoles are not OS's and that Microsoft would actually be smart enough to not try to market them the same. No no no, let's assume MS is greedy and incompetent. Afterall, that's how they became a 20+ billion dollar company.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  9. Wait on a sec... by xshariq · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think it's not a bad idea, I mean yeah who wants to play old school xbox when you can play the brand new super cool xbox 2! but they're some people who like to play old games on their new system. This may cause them not to 'mod' their xbox 2 or whatever, it's like "oh damn! I can't play halo/halo2 on my xbox 2...this sucks!"

  10. Re:Upgrade Cycle by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd presume someone with the intent to install linux on their Xbox might also be capable of making their own (as simple as matching coloured wires and joining them together for a quick bodge job).

    You'd be surprised at how many competent Linux system administrators and homebrew game developers can't solder worth a.

  11. Re:Upgrade Cycle by ScottyUK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bare the wires, stick em together with electrical tape :P A true bodge job.

    --
    Nice weather for penguins...
  12. This is not a new tactic. by Dash'n'SlashDot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On December 10, 1994, most kids were playing second and third generation SNES games, but also on this day, the final NES game was released: Wario's Woods and Nintendo finally retired the system, several years AFTER the SNES took center stage. More recently, third-party developers developed games for the PS1, albeit for a younger audience. Microsoft is just getting this information out in the open before release trying to keep the sales of the Xbox going even though a newer system is nigh.

    1. Re:This is not a new tactic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you even trying to make sense? In every single one of the cases you cite, Microsoft actually continued to support the system after they had claimed they would abandon support for it! And you're trying to make out this means they will stop supporting XBox earlier than they said they would?

      Either you're a very smart troll, or a blithering idiot. My money's on the latter.

  13. No big deal... by Taulin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    PS1 titles were still coming out several years or more after PS2 came out. Why all the fuss? I bet MS even gives a royaly break for those developing Xbox1 titles after XBox2's release.