Slashdot Mirror


Linus Drops BitKeeper

ravenII wrote in to mention a story running on CNet, which discusses Linus Torvald's decision to no longer use BitKeeper. From the article: "Linus Torvalds is looking for a new SCM for his project's source code after a conflict involving the current management system, BitKeeper. 'I've decided to not use BK (BitKeeper) mainly because I need to figure out the alternatives,' Torvalds said in a posting. 'Rather than continuing things as normal, I decided to bite the bullet and just see what life without BK looks like.' Coverage on the BitKeeper announcement from earlier this week is also available. Update: 04/10 16:36 GMT by Z : Updated to reflect the story's origin.

22 of 548 comments (clear)

  1. He should use ClearCase. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's what the professionals use.


    I believe even Microsoft don't always 'eat their own dogfood' on this one.

  2. Hmm. by millennial · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, there's always CVS... *sigh*...
    Or you could teach your code to two hundred trained squirrels, a la Tim Burton. Then every time you changed some code, you could train another squirrel. Not only would you have an army of Code Squirrels at your command, but... eh, you'd probably be locked up...

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:Hmm. by lewp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah. Concurrent Version Squirrels.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    2. Re:Hmm. by node+3 · · Score: 4, Funny
      a la Tim Burton

      I'm confused...

      Linus is Willy Wonka, and the rest of the kernel developers are Oompa Loompas?

      What has me confused isn't so much that I think that that's true, but that it just seems so right somehow.
      Oompa Loompa doompadee doo
      I've got another puzzle for you.
      Oompa Loompa doompadah dee
      If you are wise you will listen to me.

      Who do you blame when your software goes closed,
      The source is kept secret, so nobody knows?
      Blaming the user is such a shame
      You know exactly who's to blame:
      The closed software proprietor!

      Oompa Loompa doompadee dah
      If you're use GNU then you will go far.
      You will live in freedom too
      Like the Oompa Loompa doompadee do.
  3. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you trying to subvert Linux? You must work for Microsoft!

    Ba-dum-tish! Thank you, I'll be here all week. Try the veal, tip your waitress!

  4. Better headline might be: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bitkeeper loses only customer

  5. Three Words by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    Visual Source Safe!

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Three Words by Duck1123 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure that'll work great when he ports Linux over to .Net

    2. Re:Three Words by Seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fortunately, keeping bits will be a much simpler task now that they are standing perpendicular.

    3. Re:Three Words by dj245 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Visual Source Safe!

      Not safe enough. Its only a visual safe after all. What this situation calls for is a box that once closed, will remain shut and untampered with. A lockbox, you might say...

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  6. Re:Netcraft confirms it by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new karma-whoring cliche mixing overlords.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  7. Re:CVS? by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why not use CVS?

    Now that's a great idea. I'm sure Linus didn't even look at that option when he decided to use a SCM!

  8. Re:In post-9/11 Soviet Korea by natrius · · Score: 4, Funny

    In post-9/11 America, the Department of Homeland Security has noticed an increased level of chatter on the terrorist communications lines. Among the discussions has been unusually prevalent talk of cliche enrichment. We suspect that these terrorists have allied with "Korea", "Soviet Russia", and "Natalie Portman covered in hot grits" to obtain the sophisticated equipment necessary to enrich cliches. We have no choice but to amend the Constitution to disallow speech that contains cliches.

    To enforce this amendment, any discussion involving cliche proliferation will be punished with negative moderation. For good measure, the poster will also be sent to Guantanamo.

  9. Re:perpendicular bitkeeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes! That way we can store 10x the data in the same ammount of space. This will solve the 32bit int number problem they are having.

    Lets get perpendicular!

  10. Re:He seems to be writing his own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's what Prof. Knuth would've done. Take a few years off and solve the SCM problem first, that OS stuff can wait.

  11. Re:Q & A SCM? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, yeah. We got extra Knuths, just dropping out of the trees.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  12. Re:Q & A SCM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Linus has to like it.

    Ah ha! Tove can be the new SCM.

  13. Re:BitKeeper Website by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, nothing free makes any economic sense whatsoever.

    Like Google, providing a free web search service running on a free OS (Linux) using free/open protocols (HTTP over TCP over IP) and serving pages in a free/open standard (HTML).

    And no one used Sendmail and BIND, those free programs aren't used at all by any one with any economic signifcant right?

    (Note, I was being sarcastic - just thought I'd make that clear before someone with an itchy trigger finger mods this post as "Flamebait".

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  14. Re:GNU Arch? by nathanh · · Score: 4, Funny
    Does anyone happen to know whether GNU Arch has been considered?

    ,,Oh+God@I_hope_he,,doesnt+use++arch.

    =I,couldn't++bear=the=pain.

  15. Re:GNU Arch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Normally a post like this would be moderated 'funny', but for that to happen, the moderator would have to have arch experience and both arch users are out of mod points today.

  16. Re:What are the odds... by bheading · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great idea. Linus should stop writing kernel code (what everyone seems to think he's good at) and create *yet another* GPL revision control system to add to the 20-odd that already exist.

    I wish I could shoot anyone who uses the cliched catchphrase "I for one".

  17. Re:GNU tools by SA+Stevens · · Score: 2, Funny

    UNIX was open source from AT&T

    If we had a time machine handy, I'd like to introduce you to a room full of AT&T Attorneys.