IBM Calls for Patent Reform
daria42 writes "IBM has called for tighter regulation of patents and a review of intellectual property ownership issues in collaborative software development. The company is one of the largest patent-holders in the United States. IBM executive Jim Stallings said examining patents for prior art should not only be the job of the patent office but that the wider community should be involved. Stallings also called on the industry to stop what he calls "bad behaviour" by companies who either seek patents for unoriginal work or collect and hoard patents."
FRSIT PTS0
Me too!
Hello kettle, this is pot. Dude, I'm SO wasted.
Yes, it's stupid, but I bet you laughed.
this is getting old and so are you
blog
Without patents, a little guy can invent something, and then a big guy can come along and copy it. Not having paid for the research into it, they can probably sell it for less too. Result - Little guy goes out of business and big guys keep selling product for $$$.
Patents can protect the small guys from the big guys.
Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
(And, since this is Slashdot, I feel the need to point out that I'm not serious).
not anymore
-your boss
Actually, I did see a few headlines on Slashdot. So I looked a lot deeper into how patents were used in practice. Lo and behold, the "sensationalist headlines" were just the tip of the iceberg.
The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'