Slashdot Mirror
Offshored Identity Theft
Travoltus writes "The threat of increased misuse of consumer personal data by offshore criminals was first made publicly known with the UCSF Pakistani medical transcriber scandal. Then, in a logical progression of events, it was discovered that foreign criminal interests were offering money to offshored call center workers to surrender consumer data. Now that threat has been realized: Offshored call center staffers at Mphasis BPO have allegedly stolen £200,000 using United States customers' personal information. It is believed that Indian police reacted swiftly to catch the thieves, but only £12,000 has been recovered so far, and it is not really known who orchestrated this theft or where the rest of that money is now. It is also unknown as of yet how much of a mess this has created for the U.S. citizens who were victimized. Let's hope that the people whose information was stolen don't have to go through what other identity theft victims have to endure, to clean up their good name."
Why is identity theft by foreigners considered more scary that identity theft by Americans. I'd bet you $100 that the vast, vast, vast majority of credit card fraud on Americans is committed by their fellow countrymen[0].
[0] Or women.
Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
The worst part about stuff like this is that the system is set up in favor of the person stealing the information. There are what seems to be very few safeguards to prevent the theft of someone's information. However, when it's time to clean up the mess, those responsible for it, including companies that were mishandling the information, are nowhere to be found. Thus leaving the victim to spend excessive amounts of time and money clearing their "good" name. Just proves the only person watching out for you is yourself, so be careful who you trust.
Whatever you tink about Lou Dobbs, it's very irresponsible to just dismiss him as a racist.
Even "nationalist" is nonsense, he's merely pointing out one of the problems with unresitriced and unbalanced "unfair" trade. Now, you could argue this is a good thing, and we could point out the problems and have a discussion. But by labeling him a racist, the only thing you're trying to do is to "shut down" any arguments by coming up with ridiculous ad hominem attacks.
I'm an immigrant to this country, and I'm not a fan of outsourcing. I'm all for other immigrants from all over the world to continue coming here and contributing their talents to our local economies, but there is a problem when now people don't even want to become US residents, because they jobs are being drained away from here. We're about to face a serious crisis, when our technological workforce is being decimated by these companies. And there's nothing racist in pointing that out, nothing.
As for security, I don't think most if any people here are saying that a particular nationality is less trustworthy. But you'd be a fool if you don't recognize that some of the safety mechanism we enjoy in this country, are not as robust or even exist in other parts of the less developed world. As we deal with the poorest of nations, with our sensitive data, we have to be *extremely* careful. Already, there have been incidents of bribing by local crime syndicates in some of these countries to obtain data to steal identities. Can that happen in the US? Of course! But the question is, where is it more likely, and what are the protections we need to employ in these situations.
There's a rich discussion to be had on this topic, but please, try to come up with something better than "they're racist".
"Keep your friends close and your enemies closer."
Closer, in the instant case, meaning the same continent or at least someplace where we can capture and prosecute the fsckers.
Bill Clinton: Pimp we can believe in. - The Shirt!!!
That's all that matters to upper management -- savings. Now, with many offshoring efforts only yielding 10 or 15% savings, what does an event like this do? It blows any potential savings, resulting in a net loss. Nice going, Mr. Shiny Hair And Teeth Strategic-Thinker!
Now, this question is directed at those big-shot CIOs who troll here, let me ask you something (feel free to reply as ACs). How much money does something like *this* cost your precious bottom line? And when it happens again, then what? What could possibly happen that would make you think "Gee, maybe our technical staff shouldn't live on the other side of the world and work for somebody else (including our competition)?" Or does that even matter?
Yeah, yeah, I know... Fugeddaboutit, it's purely rhetorical. I realize that employment horizon of the corporate ruling class is only as far ahead as their golden parachute payout. I'm sure you'll find a way to blame these failures on somebody else, Mr. Executive, and your replacement can implement a new strategy for cleaning up the mess.
Sure location matters. If your employees are nearby, you can keep tabs on them. You might even be able to directly affect their morale in a positive manner.
Either way, you can keep better control of things.
Also, culture is relevant in these matters. Some countries have traditions of institutionalized graft. To casually gloss over such differences is the real racist notion here.
What you are promoting is pretty much equivalent to the notion that if you speak slow enough everyone will understand english.
A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
I think the issue underscored here is risk vs. reward. For someone in the US 30,000 USD isn't *that* much, not enough for many of us to risk jail time. That amount barely covers a years salary for many and I'd say for most reading this site it is way less then a years salary. If you're making $2.00/hr that is a LOT of money. Now we are talking almost a DECADE of salary.
My aim was certainly not to give the impression that I distrust people outside the United States but rather to discuss the idea of the purported plan for an "ownership society" within the U.S. of:
1. US Workers do menial labor
2. US outsources menial labor
3. US Workers do skilled labor
4. US outsources skilled labor
5. US Workers own everything and do no labor
6. US outsources all labor
What do we expect will happen? Why will we "own" everything? Because a piece of paper says we own it. What happens when the people that actually do the work tear up the piece of paper?
I think incidents like this are tiny examples of what's to come.
I'm a big tall mofo.
There is a remedy for handling this in the future for US citizens. We need to push our legislators to enforce it, which is obviously hard to do.
US Corporations are legally (criminally and civily) liable for the accuracy and protection of data that they collect on US Citizens.
This then needs to be negotiated into international treaties.
This would make a given company think twice about what information it really needs to be collecting, and how it will be protected. If the company wishes to outsource work, fine, that needs to be disclosed, and the company still remains liable for the protection of that data.
There need to be laws, and the laws must have teeth. This is a "service" that companies are carrying out "in the public trush." They need to be penalized for violations.