Lessons Proprietary Software Can Teach Open Source
cdlu writes "Kris Shaffer at Newsforge argues that just because software is open source doesn't mean it should be unpopular. What lessons, he asks, can open source projects learn from popular proprietary software?" From the article: "In the absence of a monopoly, there are three traits that are likely to make an application popular: it is cool or attractive in some way, it provides easy entry, and it is addictive. Barring these things, most average users will stick with the status quo. In fact, many users never use a program on their computer that did not come pre-installed. However, by creating an attractive, easy to set up, addictive application, a developer can motivate the average user to break this barrier and try something new. And several such applications can generate strong popular interest in the open source movement in general."
Ah. It makes sense now...
- MS Office Opium
- MS Office Morphine, to help you break your addiction to MS Office Opium
- MS Office Heroin, to help you break your addiction to MS Office Morphine
Clearly businesses do have alternatives, we just didn't know the code names.next up: MS Office Crack, soon to be followed by Out-Of-Money and switching to Open Office to break the cycle.
Sounds more like video games, as they can be very addictive, but I don't ever recall lying awake at night, with the shakes, because it's been 36 hours since my last hit of Excel.
Easy entry, I'd assume means easy to access the application and use it, getting desired results with a minimum of fuss. I can't say this is exclusive to proprietary software, because some highly successful packages have very steep learning curves and can vary from version to version in ways which can be maddening. (I recently replaced a several step process for producing lists with a one-button application and the end-user was alarmed because the page count didn't match what they expected. Well, I added an extra item per page because I had space, guess I should have explained that one, eh? But it completely bypassed the need for Office Tools, which were a large source of frustration in a frequently run process.)
Reliability seems to be overrated, however, as I've seen any number of vendor packages blow up, and an IT manager simply say, "well let me know when you get it fixed" Even when it's a desktop app that several users may be using (and man, will they whine when they lose even a minutes work!)
Perhaps what proprietary software is best at is concealing easter eggs.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
"..attractive in some way, it provides easy entry, and it is addictive."
...
Interesting turn of a phrase
"This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
Gee, with insight like that it's hard to imagine how the LNUX stock price could be down 99.8% from its peak!
What I'm listening to now on Pandora...
Open source or closed source--my guess is that as long as it has a spellchecker, you'll be happy.
From the article: In fact, many users never use a program on their computer that did not come pre-installed.
My parents use GAIN software all the time.
Web Design Tips
...An office suite that is as easy to use as this:
http://www.shockhaber.com/zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.htm
and as addictive as this is:
http://www.hurtwood.demon.co.uk/Fun/copter.swf
Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
- W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
And suddenly, a Porn idea spawns defense and espionage related applications.
"Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
"All the rest is just FUDD that programmers worry about."
:-)
Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt, and... what... more Doubt?
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
"No traces left behind on the hard drive..."
:-)
The keyboard, however, is another matter entirely.
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
My g/f tried to get by with "Trust me", but I still use a condom.