Slashdot Mirror


The Sony/MP3 Saga Continues

Renegade Lisp writes "Sony's rolling out their new line of flash-based music players to the market these days. More stylish than ever, they surely look like a serious attempt to regain territory lost to the iPod, and perhaps even to create the Walkman of the 21st century. And it looks like Sony has finally given in to consumer pressure: these new "MP3 players" can finally play MP3 natively, not just Sony's proprietary ATRAC format. But wait -- you cannot just put your MP3s onto the device, you have to run them through Sony's obfuscation software first. The obfuscated files, when installed properly on the device, can be played. But you can't just move them around, share them with your friends, whatever. Well, of course the obfuscation scheme has already been broken by a brave hacker. But is this really the way to create the "Network Walkman" of the 21st century? Sony, please wake up!"

3 of 629 comments (clear)

  1. CD based MP3 player's don't obfuscate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Their CD based MP3 players require no such obfuscation scheme.

  2. Re:Egh by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sony is notorious for coming up with useful, and often superior technology, while at the same time ignoring the actual markets demands that they are targeting.

    See betamax and minidiscs

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  3. Re:You People don't get it by MagicMike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You ignore the cases where the manufacturer / service provider ceases to exist (or ceases doing business with you, a la BitMover) and you lose access to the content (either slowly as hardware dies and software succumbs to entropy, or quickly if something like Steam goes away)

    Open content formats are the only way to be sure you can access your content, period. Anything else requires trust, and I don't trust corporations because our interests are always in conflict.

    Doesn't seem odd to me to want to be sure you can access your content, so it seems reasonable to demand open formats.

    "Illegal Activity" is a red herring, and something of the Godwin's Law of copyright arguments.