Slashdot Mirror


Blogs Latest Source of PC Infection

smooth wombat writes "The BBC has a story which indicates that filtering firm Websense believes at least 200 fake blogs are in existence which have malicious code that could infect your pc. Websense said it had seen examples of some computer criminals creating a legitimate looking weblog, loading it with keylogging software or viral code, and then sending out the address of it through instant messenger or spam e-mail. Websense warned that viruses hosted on weblogs might be a danger because they get round the filtering systems many firms have created to ensure malicious programs do not reach employees." From the article: "In separate cases some blogs were being used as storage lockers holding chunks of malicious code that the controller of a network of zombie machines wants those remotely-controlled computers to use."

21 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. Websense == Bad by maotx · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    1. Re:Websense == Bad by Stick_Fig · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who wants to take a bet that Websense is making this up just to ban blogs?

      --
      ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
    2. Re:Websense == Bad by bcmm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, yes.

      At my Sixth Form, Websense will sometimes give the catagory of banned page as "Alternative Journals", a bit more questionable than the "Bad taste" catagory.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    3. Re:Websense == Bad by justforaday · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too bad I can't see the site...

      Your organization's Internet use policy restricts access to this web page at this time.

      Reason:

      The Websense category "Tasteless" is filtered.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  2. So... by Skye16 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So basically they're saying there are now webpages that exist to infect your computer with malicious code through various browser security holes? Huh. Imagine that. I never would have thought that to be possible.

    Dot dot dot.

    1. Re:So... by Pac · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, think this security guys are too paranoid. Next they will say the innocent attachments strangers keep sending me in my email messages will harm my computer. What about having some faith in people's good intentions?

  3. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... as if the fact they're largely written by self-important bores wasn't reason enough to avoid blogs and bloggers.

    1. Re:Wow by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Funny

      People? I thought they were written by computer programs!

      Seriously, I thought were already some form of worm. User surfs web, is infected by code. Code signs up for an account under the user's name and starts posting lots of "omg lol w00t" garbage intermixed with copies of itself. I mean, nobody really WRITES like that, right? It HAS to be some sort of glitch...

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  4. So if the blog says.... by GPLDAN · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the blog you are reading says...
    "Today, I went with Billy and Johnny, and we went to the farm and saw a cow. It was a big cow! Download this program and it will show you how big the cow was!" ... you probably shouldn't download the code.

    If the blog purports to be from some p0rnster, and the blog says "download this cool active X control, it will let you see all these hot pix I took at the club last night"... you probably shouldn't install the control.


    Ok, I think I got it.

    1. Re:So if the blog says.... by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But how are we supposed to view the hot pix that he took last night?

  5. Re:Only 200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You've confused the word "infected" with the phrase "worth reading"

  6. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    how do these blogs get outside the browser sandbox?

    publishing this sort of rubbish should be punished.

  7. Linux still not ready for the desktop by deacon · · Score: 3, Funny
    This is another example of the lack of compatability that is preventing Linux from being successful on the Desktop.

    Lacking the broad compatibility of Windows to run any executable at any time without pestering the user, Linux will slowly fall out of favor as the more "user friendly" Windows proves yet again that everthing "just works".

    Developers must get their act together to make Firefox compatible with these soon -to-be mainstream methods of allowing users to update their PCs without worrying their little heads over such arcane details as "what does this application do?"

    Until Linux can match Windows in this kind of ease of use, I'll have to stop using FC3 and Firefox and upgrade to XP and IE.

    Note to mods: This post contains sarcasm. Do not eat.

    1. Re:Linux still not ready for the desktop by matt+me · · Score: 2, Funny

      ha ha, i'm too in firefox on fedora core 3, and yes, it's tough.

      me, i tried everything to get infected. i tried an ActiveX plugin for Firefox, i tried running IE through Wine - still nothing very nasty.

      in the end i wrote a perl script to open random double click ads in lynx.

  8. Glass houses by guet · · Score: 5, Funny

    yeah, I know, I read this site because it's written by humble yet well-informed and interesting people, who are careful not to make generalisations.

    1. Re:Glass houses by wootest · · Score: 4, Funny

      I personally NEVER make generalisations, and I'm convinced everyone else here doesn't either.

  9. Ban them!!!1 by pwroberts · · Score: 2, Funny

    QUICK!! Ban blogs!!

    Oh wait, the majority of the US public already want to :-).

  10. Re: appologies to Jeff Foxworthy by HomerJayS · · Score: 2, Funny
    If the blog purports to be from some p0rnster, and the blog says "download this cool active X control, it will let you see all these hot pix I took at the club last night"... and you install the control...

    You might be a dumbarse!

  11. Re:Other than Corporations.. by lottameez · · Score: 4, Funny

    According to the emails *I* get, bored housewives are not looking at blogs at all. They'd much rather meet with me when their husbands are out of town. (this internet thing is *really* something)

    --
    Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
  12. Re:Other than Corporations.. by Slashcrap · · Score: 4, Funny

    According to the emails *I* get, bored housewives are not looking at blogs at all. They'd much rather meet with me when their husbands are out of town.

    What? You get those too?

    I though it was just my hot cock they were after.

    I'm feeling rather depressed all of a sudden.

  13. Re:Beyond my understanding by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2, Funny

    What do you expect when there's a back door like *that* on your site?