Slashdot Mirror


Satellite Easter Eggs

TheChocolatay writes "Wired has a story on hidden finds in satellite images. They range from sporting events to natural disasters to bombs and firefights in Iraq. Some very interesting and cool pictures." From the article: "Part of it is that we collect so much imagery that a lot of times no eyes have seen a lot of this stuff,...And so (we) go to an area, pop it open, and wow, we didn't intend to capture this icebreaker pushing this submarine."

19 of 508 comments (clear)

  1. I guess by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Informative

    that this is similar a bit to Google Sightseeing

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  2. Re:Best Game for Bored Workers by NardofDoom · · Score: 2, Informative

    BBcode on the brain. Real linky.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  3. Why is everyone so impressed with Google Maps? by ahecht · · Score: 2, Informative
    I don't really see the appeal of Google Maps Satellite imagery, since terraserver-usa.com has been offering color aerial photos that are four times the resolution, larger in size, and free of watermarks. Plus, unlike google, Terraserver-USA has a link that makes it easy to download large images.

    Sure, Google Maps is great if you want your route overlayed on the images, but for finding easter eggs it's nothing special.

    1. Re:Why is everyone so impressed with Google Maps? by ahecht · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you select the Urban Areas data, you get .25m resolution maps. Google, as far as I know, only goes down to 1m resolution.

  4. Whole blog devoted to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Google site-seeing":

    http://www.shreddies.org/gmaps/

    Cool to see planes in the air

  5. Re:How are these Easter Eggs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    on some days, it's cloudy, &c. -- someone has to go through all of the satalite pics and find nice, clear images to piece together into the mosaic that you see, when you go to the site. if those picking and choosing have e.g. five shots of Ann Arbor, three of them on a clear day, and one of them with the UM cheerleaders running the "naked mile"... *that*'s how you get the "Easter Eggs".

  6. Re:Planetary Easter Eggs by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative
    These are supposed to be fairly huge, so I wonder how long it will take for some to find them?

    Hitler Youth had planted some trees in the Black Forest which changed color earlier in the autumn showing a very large swastika from the air. It was in Time or something several years ago. The article indicated many of the trees would be cut down.

    A shame, it's not like the trees had done anything wrong...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  7. Re:Best Game for Bored Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is area 51, really: Area 51

    A plane taking off at SFO

    Edwards, with two SR-71 Blackbird

    Niagara Falls

    Norfolk, with two aircraft carrier

    Mount St-Helens

    Hollywood, litterally

    To find the picture of a particular position, use:
    http://maps.google.com/?t=k&z=3&ll=LATTITUDE,LONGI TUDE
    LATTITUDE and LONGITUDE in degree (like 100.003441).

    Enjoy!

  8. Re:The Plane capture by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 2, Informative
  9. This is impressive, www.wired.com is totally /.ed by wsanders · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nice! The entire site is down!

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  10. Re:Interesting, yet... by d_p · · Score: 5, Informative

    In 1996, the US Congress passed the Kyl-Bingaman Amendment to the Defense Appropriations Act. That law says that the US government may not license an American remote sensing company to collect or disseminate imagery of Israel at a better resolution than what is generally available from remote sensing companies in other countries, i.e. 2 meters.

  11. Re:Interesting, yet... by bluephone · · Score: 2, Informative

    Google bought Keyhole. Keyhole brought you those cool satellite photos of Baghdad and Afghanistan on CNN the past couple years. I'm pretty sure Baghdad and Afghanistan aren't in the US.

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  12. Re:The Capitol by Shishak · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Now I hope and pray that I will But today I am still, just a bill
  13. Re:What's This? by WAG24601G · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you look at the URL, you'll notice the location is Groom Lake, NV. Groom Lake is a location commonly used to test "black aircraft" (experimental, spy, etc). If you do a bit of research on the name, you'll find a number of books referencing aircraft tests there in the last 50 years. The fact that the planes operated there are mostly experimental accounts for an abnormally long airstrip (in case of mishaps). The whole location is actually just an old dried up lake bed, which is ideally flat for aircraft operations. Lockheed's Skunk Works worked out of Groom Lake several times, though the names of the specific projects escape me.

    --
    Everything is easy when you don't understand the problem.
  14. Re:Best Game for Bored Workers by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

    You want a high definition sat image of Area 51? Your wish is my command.

  15. Re:Before or after Burning Man by Twilight1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    While I don't know whether this is a before or after picture, I can tell you that it was taken Aug 18th, 2003 18:36:19. I'll leave the rest of the exercise to the reader. :)

    Cheers,
    Twilight1

  16. Re:What's This? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

    The runway at Edwards is considerably longer. It's 7-1/2 miles from end to end.

    And for the record, Groom Lake was publicly acknowledged years ago. No mystery there. It's just an Air Force base.

  17. Re:Nothing New by coopex · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not the orbit height or the speed, it's basic physics. Assuming you have some satellite with a 3m lens in orbit at 400km. We use visible light that is on average about 500nm wavelength. The minimum resolvable angle for a circular lens is theta = 1.22*lambda/D, which comes out to be, 203*10^-9, so the absolute maximum resolution is about 8cm via some trig, and more like at least twice that because of atmospheric effects.

    --
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions.