Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Judge Denies SCO's Ex Parte Motion to Adjourn

Posted by Zonk on from the sit-down-and-shut-up dept.

karvind writes "Groklaw has up an article stating that judge Kimball has issued an order regarding SCO's Ex Parte Motion to Adjourn the April 21, 2005 Argument on SCO's Motion to Amend Its Complaint: The Motion is denied. SCO has finally filed its 10Q." From the article: "The court declines to adjourn the hearing. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SCO's Ex Parte Motion to Adjourn the April 21, 2005 Argument on SCO's Motion to Amend Its Complaint is DENIED. In addition to hearing SCO's Motion to Amend its Complaint and SCO's Motion to Compel the Deposition of Samuel Palmisano at the April 21, 2005 hearing, the parties are hereby NOTIFIED that the court will also hear argument regarding the parties' Proposed Scheduling Orders."

5 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. The meaning of this... by kangpeh · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Basically, for those of you who do not realize what this posting means - please try to click on some of the links and read about the situations. Also, I do not know the article offhand - but there were other articles regarding SCO and copyrights and so forth. Good luck in reading more about this.

  2. Re:Erp... by Flywheels+of+Fire · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Check my earlier post which the mods have graciously marked as troll. It has a link to a plain English explanation.

    --
    Iran captures three CIA agents
  3. fuck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    our cause. gay direct orders, or mu7ated testicle of

  4. Re:IANAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    mmm...dougnut!

  5. The GOSTAK disdims the DOSHES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    http://www.kith.org/logos/words/lower2/ggostak.htm l