Slashdot Mirror


AMD Dual-Core Performance Revealed

Timmus writes "In two separate articles, FiringSquad takes a look at the performance of AMD's dual-core Opteron CPU. The first article examines the performance of dual-core in scientific computing applications (MATLAB and LS-DYNA) as well as digital photography, while the second story focuses on the performance of dual-core Opteron paired against Intel's dual-core Pentium Extreme Edition in video encoding, Cinebench, and a few other applications. The performance improvements are pretty impressive in multi-threaded applications that take advantage of the technology."

4 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. full article mirrors by winkydink · · Score: 5, Interesting

    here and here.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  2. Chance for someone to karma whore... by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK. Anyone have a quick simple explanation of why Dual Core over Dual CPU motherboard? are there inherent advantages to dual CPUs so close together?

  3. 1 Dual Core vs Dual CPUs? by uofitorn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wouldn't a better benchmark be to compare a dual core setup to a similarly configured dual processor workstation?

    --
    "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
    "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
  4. Anyone realize that suddenly all P4's disappear? by denominateur · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now, it's struck me as very peculiar that the benchmarks where the dual dual core setup from AMD really shines leave out any comparison whatsoever to the Intel dual-core offering. This begs the question whether the person doing this review is a journalist or a marketing represenatative of AMD.

    "We did not have time to evaluate the Intel platform with the Intel MKL, the P4 3.0GHz is an older reference measurement." is a very cheap excuse and indicates either lazyness or bribes on the side of AMD... I hate hardware review sites!