Librarians Fighting to Save Moore's Law Issue
wambaugh writes "As
reported earlier, Intel is offering $10,000 for a copy of the April 19, 1965 issue of Electronics containing Moore's original article predicting
'Moore's Law.' Now it is
being reported that
academic science libraries are having to
make sure no go-getters make off with their copies. At least one
copy is
already missing from the University of Illinois. Too bad Intel won't settle for a pdf."
I really hope you're joking; that's more than a shovel full of bogus sentiment. I mean, Intel is going to use this magazine for the same purpose that libraries currently do, except that more people will now be aware of it, so don't pretend that this is a valid opportunity for learning institutions to squeeze money from corporate America. I know that everyone is out there sharing and caring about a 40 year old magazine that can now be found in .pdf format for free all over the web, and so is completely useless for the purposes of 99% or greater of the world's researchers. Seriously, why would you need the physical copy of it, unless you're planning a museum-type display, or must test the physical and chemical properties of magazine pages from April 1965?
Lighten up. The truth is that someone nicked a copy of a magazine from a library, and you are aware that it actually happens all the time. It's wrong and is a crime and should be prosecuted when the thief is caught. If librarians don't like it, they should work diligently protecting their resources and stop standing behind the circulation desk filing their nails, as i can tell you from experience most librarians at U.S. colleges are doing.
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: That averages about 660,000,000 of each kind.