Slashdot Mirror


Tridge Releases BitKeeper-Compatible Tool

Peter Willis writes "Looking at Freshmeat today (a part of OSTG) it seems Andrew Tridgell has released the BitKeeper-compatible source code management client mentioned on slashdot recently, called SourcePuller. As part of the downloads available for the project you can also get dump files which detail how to pull data from BK trees without the use of libsp. From the README: 'SourcePuller is not intended to be a full replacement for BitKeeper. Instead, you should use SourcePuller as an interoperability tool for situations where you cannot use bk itself. SourcePuller is missing a large amount of core functionality from BitKeeper, and thus is not suitable as a full replacement.'" Article available about the release on The Register.

11 of 189 comments (clear)

  1. Like Grains of Sand in an Hourglass... by jeff_schiller · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...so goes the soap opera that has become the Linux community

  2. Re:As Tridge says in the README by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Funny

    You heard it hear first, Tridge is anti-comments. If you want GCC to continue to support comments, speak up now or forever hold your peace.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  3. Logo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A big huge middle finger!

  4. Re:As Tridge says in the README by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the source code I've seen and debugged, it seems most programmers are anti-comments.

  5. Re:As Tridge says in the README by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 5, Funny

    "heard it hear first"

    Jesus God, that's one of the dumbest fuckups I've seen in a /. comment, and it's in my comment.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  6. Why the P.C name? by thehunger · · Score: 5, Funny

    A tool that lets you Pull stuff out of BitKeeper. How did he manage to avoid naming it BitPull?

    1. Re:Why the P.C name? by williw · · Score: 5, Funny

      As soon as I read your comment, I immediately thought he should have call it PitBull or KeepBitter (get it... reverse engineering reverse name, unintended consequences. har har har)

  7. Re:Why not GNU Arch? by spworley · · Score: 4, Funny
    Its however not a lost case, Bazaar-ng is trying to fix those problems of Arch

    And with the support of the community, and a lot of developer work, they'll be able to reduce Arch's 'help' text down to only 10 words, making it the most powerful source control system.
  8. Re:As Tridge says in the README by indifferent+children · · Score: 5, Funny
    it seems most programmers are anti-comments

    You're kidding right? What do you call all of that whitespace that we sprinkle around our code? Those are comments.

    If a block of code is especially self-contained or tricky, then it is surrounded by two carriage-returns before the block and two carriage-returns after the block.

    If some statements are part of a loop, then we gratuitously indent them. That's not for the compiler's benefit; those are comments.

    Don't even get me started on our extreme generosity in supplying names (not just types!) in our function and method prototypes. What, you want us to draw you a map?



    BTW, I would submit more Insightful comments in my code if only my peers with good karma had Mod Points at code review time.

    --
    Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  9. Re:As Tridge says in the README by Foosinho · · Score: 4, Funny

    Two "+5 Funny" out of the same post? I bow down to your slash-skills.

  10. Used already? by jefu · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't that Wendy's new Logo?