Forgent and Microsoft Sue Each Other Over JPEG
goombah99 writes "CNET reports that the long running Forgent JPEG patent claim story has a new turn. Forgent Networks has filed a lawsuit against Microsoft, alleging the software giant infringed on its digital-image compression patent that serves as the technology behind JPEG. The suit comes in response to a suit Microsoft filed last week, asking the courts to find Forgent's patent unenforceable. '... despite Microsoft's recent inquiries about licensing the patent, they chose to file a lawsuit, leaving us no alternative but to assert infringement claims against it,' stated Richard Snyder, chief executive of Forgent. U.S. patent No. 4,698,672, relates to video image compression and transmission specifically and compression in general. The underlying technology is an amalgam of Cosine Transforms, Huffman coding, and odd details. Major corporations are respecting Forgent's claims: to date Forgent has collected about 100 million dollars in payments from computer and camera companies for this patent settling on suits with 31 companies. Past slashdot stories here, here and here. How might this impact Longhorn? Forgent has shown interest in selling it (to Compaq) so it's not unthinkable Microsoft could just buy it and own it."
1 - How can capitalists defend their system after clearly stating over and over that Businesses doesn't involve ethics?
o ld=-1&commentsort=3&tid=123&mode=thread&pid=123323 28#12332347
2 - Actually, i would LOVE the fact that Harry Potter and O'Reilly woudln't exist at all!.
Cheap mass-produced, pseudo-literature for stupid kids, and market-driven, badly written. very basic, technical documentation?? Who needs that?.
3 - The GPL is a hack arround copyright. The GPL is about Free Software, it doesn't have a damn thing to do with Open Source. Please read this post: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=147175&thresh
WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?