Slashdot Mirror


First Look at Libranet Linux 3.0

SilentBob4 writes "Mad Penguin has published a comprehensive review of the latest Libranet release. New in this release are an improved installer and revamped/modernized AdminMenu that rivals Mandriva's MCC and SUSE's YaST. Aside from major desktop versions lagging behing a version or two, this release easily puts Libranet in the same league as Ubuntu, and the review has sparked some "Ubuntu vs. Libranet" arguements so far, one on the Libranet forum itself. Check it out for yourself. The review is complete with many screenshots as well as Flash movies of the AdminMenu & installer in action."

4 of 17 comments (clear)

  1. The BIG difference between Libranet & Ubuntu by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Funny

    The BIG difference between Libranet & Ubuntu.

    Libranet ships with vi(m), while Ubuntu ships with Emacs.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  2. My experiences with both Ubuntu and Libranet by yotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ubuntu: I have installed Ubuntu multiple times and every time it installed with no issues, except once when I muddled around with the settings before letting it do its thing. It is the only distro I've found that sees my nic in my laptop with no effort on my part. I am extremely happy with it and plan on putting it on my main computer as soon as I can justify a new HDD.
    Libranet: I saw that I had to pay for it and wondered why I should, when Ubuntu is so nice for free?

    (Yes, I am going to be donating to Ubuntu in the very near future)

    1. Re:My experiences with both Ubuntu and Libranet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's close to my attitude -- and I used to use Libranet.

      I started with another distro, got it when I couldn't afford to pay for a distro. When I had the money, I bought a boxed set, even though I didn't install it -- I just felt it was a good product, and wanted to support it.

      I'm using Mepis on some systems, but may switch to Ubuntu or straight Debian (I'm still evaluating). When I decide which one, I'll buy a box set, even if I don't need it, to support the distro (if it's Debian, I'll average the cost of the other distros and donate that much).

      Libranet could get away with charging $70 for a copy when they were the only Debian based distro with easy install, but that's not the case anymore. When compared to free Mepis, Ubuntu, Knoppix, and Kanotix, the value per dollar for Libranet is pretty low.

      I'll go with something I can try for a few weeks, then pay for (and yes, I do pay for it) before I'll go with upgrading to something I can't test that I have to pay for.

      If I'm going to shell out that much for a distro I can't download for free, they sure as hell better provide me with something useful that makes it worth that extra money, and Libranet just doesn't have anything to offer that Ubuntu doesn't have for free.

      Yes, it's 5 CDs, but if you have broadband and you're using Debian, that's just window dressing and not really worth paying for.

      Now if they offered some kind of tech support that was above and beyond other distros, I'd consider it, but they don't.

  3. The real difference by MoogMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Libranet
    ========
    New user $89.95
    Existing Libranet users, seniors, disabled and students $64.95

    Ubuntu
    ======
    $00.00