Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Bush Signs Law Targeting P2P Pirates

Posted by Zonk on from the another-victory-in-the-war-on-terror dept.

BlakeCaldwell writes "CNet is reporting that President Bush signed into law the Family Entertainment and Copyright Act (previously-reported). A lawbreaker can land in jail for up to three years for distributing a single copy of a prerelease movie on the Internet. The MPAA's president Dan Glickman applauded the move, stating he wanted to 'thank the congressional sponsors of this legislation for their strong advocacy for intellectual property rights.'"

5 of 727 comments (clear)

  1. Time Shift? by maotx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From S.167RH, Title I, Sec 103. which can be found under the Text of Legislation:

    a. Criminal Infringement

    1. IN GENERAL- Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed:

    C. by the distribution of a work being prepared for commercial distribution, by making it available on a computer network accessible to members of the public, if such person knew or should have known that the work was intended for commercial distribution.

     So much for distribution of television shows online. Almost all of them will eventually release a DVD of the series (commercial distribution) therefore anyone posting last nights tv show as a torrent will be a criminal.

    --
    I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
  2. Arrest the First Criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since mr. GW Bush is a known pirate, I suggest the DOJ investigate him first. Any other course of action would make a mockery of the supposed blindness of lady justice.

  3. Amazing by mattmentecky · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isnt just downright amazing how out of sync sentencing is for certain crimes?

    Take for example Massachusetts Sentencing Guidlines. And compare it to this new federal law that was signed.
    Larceny on a scale of $10,000-$50,000 can get an offender 36 months (in some cases, less!) than someone breaking copyright on a *single file*. This means that Person A can walk into a physical record store and almost wipe the store clean via theft, and get sentenced the same as Person B who shares one copyrighted song online.

    That is just amazing to me.

  4. Re:Not just Americans by jobsagoodun · · Score: 5, Interesting
    f you break American law (e.g. this one) and live in any country (like the UK) which has an extradition treaty with the USA you can be brought to America and charged with the crime.

    Absolute Bollocks.

    Extradition laws apply only to laws which are punishable with jail sentences > 1 year in both countries. Generally this means serious offences like murder, abduction etc.

    Now, once the UK starts banging people up for swapping movies you may have a point...

  5. Re:Funny that they stress "Family Entertainment". by drgonzo59 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    That's what I said, what the fuck does the family have to do with the movie industry. Heck, the bill had to pass, it had the word "family" in, nobody wants to vote against family. The lawmakers are just as dumb and ridiculous as the people who elected them. How exactly is my family now more entertained than before? Why don't they add national security in there too, it would have passed much faster.

    Or, maybe the bill is self-referencial and the whole process of trying to stop people from sharing or distributing by threats is entertaintment for the whole family.

    How about I plant copies of a pre-release on somebody's computer the let the feds come and jail him for 3 years? Don't like your neighbour -put the latest peace of crap from Hollywood in the shares on his windows 98 machine and watch him burn. Can you imagine going to jail for distributing "Big Momma's House" - fun times!