Wink Chosen to Receive Noble Piece Prize
Phil Shapiro writes "Wink, a beautifully written free program for creating Flash-format animated tutorials has been chosen to receive a Noble Piece Prize, the prize that honors the craftsmanship of Alfred Noble, who worked at the Jacquard Loom factory in France. Previous winners of this prize include the Digital Bicycle web site."
Say no more, say no more
This sig is intentionally blank
Surely this will infringe the trademark of the Nobel Peace Prize
This sig is intentionally blank
This isn't the Nobel Prize. It's the Noble Prize. There is no Nobel Prize category for this type of thing.
It is a joke, but not really a joke. It is just a groovy way of acknowledging a groovy piece of work.
"That's one Noble Piece dude, someone should give you a prize for dat...hey!!"
...oh wait... The Piece Prize... Wow. It occurs to me that it is a highly humorous name for a prize. I am unable to contain myself. Really!
... This wikipedia page
I have freaks! I did something right...
I nominate the guy that invented shirts for chicks that show off their belly's. Now THAT is worth an award.
"Piece prize", maybe next year they'll get the whole thing
GETPKG - Package Management for Slackware
No, the Nobel prizes are the ones which have one for Peace.
This is the Noble Piece Prize, which has zero to do with the Nobel foundation in Zurich, and therefore not actually a big deal.
Information wants to be anthropomorphized.
Not only self-promotion on part of the author, but a completely irrelevant non-article and intentionally misleading to boot. I hope I'm not alone in expecting a higher standard from the slashdot editors.
So basically no evidence of anything at all. Is this whole article a Troll to see how many slashdotters will bite? Did the editors check a single link?
This article can be summed up as "No content here, but I have some links - Clicky clicky clicky please!!"
This is the most inane thing I have ever seen.
If you will excuse me, I'm off to make up some prizes to award to random people.
Damnit - I wanted my nick to be "WouldIPutMYRealNameOnSlashdot"
Except that it is to be confused, that's why they chose that name. It's supposed to be funny.
It's not, but it's supposed to be.
Information wants to be anthropomorphized.
Isn't this getting a little close to spamming? I mean, the app might be good, but the prize seems dodgy.
XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
It's a joke. A rather bad one. Definitely not worth posting on the front page of slashdot. But still, it's a joke.
If you read the description of the prize, it seems like it was created by Phil Shapiro, the submitter of the story.
So can I create my own Nebula Peas prize and give it to some random free software project, like Hebcal or something, and get it posted on the front page of Slashdot?
(No offense against Hebcal; I just picked the first nonfamous project that I saw browsing SourceForge.)
...
That's just background information on the Noble Piece Prize. The article is supposed to talk about Wink being chosen to recieve the Noble Piece Prize.
All joking beside (peace/piece), Wink is a great utility and is a must download. It's great for creating tutorials on how to do things on computers.
Pointless? I think not. In fact, I've just granted this story the first ever "SYFer No Bell Prize." I'll get a press release out RSN and I'll look forward to reading about it in Slashdot next month (maybe twice).
"...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
"New Awards To Compete With Nobel Prizes"0 3/1712250
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/
Are these two stories, Nobel Prizes/Noble Piece Prize, appearing the same day a coincidence? I think not.
The Biggest Lie Of Science:
"The Piece Prize will be waiting for you backstage after you give your conference paper."
Tag lost or not installed.
I realize that most of the comments are going to be jokes because of the tone of the submission but Wink itself is a very useful application.
It's similar to Macromedia Captivate and the dozens of other Flash-output screen recording tools available but what sets this app apart from the others in my opinion is it's support for Linux (it's available for Windows too) and it's price (free).
The only other app that I've used that does screen recording and outputs Flash files is the vnc2swf console based program. While vnc2swf is quite good at full motion recording it's editing capability is virtually nonexistent (there is a program called edit_vnc2swf but it's console based at least right now).
Wink has an excellent GUI, is 100% free ( I made a voluntary donation to the developer via Paypal and encourage others to do the same), allows you to do manual or full-motion (timed) captures, and has very good support for Linux. It's definitely an app worth downloading.
(Note: I'm not affiliated in any way with Wink--just a happy user).
"I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
More likley it's a paid-for ad.
Shameless
as far as I'm concerned, this fake award has as much weight to it as any other award given by a foundation, hollywood, or some other society. I think it's a cool idea. Somebody decided to recognize the achievements of someone else and tried to spread it like wildfire. I'm not sure how many are in the academy whom vote for the academy awards, but I'd bet many people would vote for Wink when given the chance to see it. It really is excellent software.
In the area of tutorials, Wink is like Firefox and Openoffice are to their respective categories. those programs have gotten plenty of awards and recognition. Wink and Satish should too. it's more of a niche program, but so is the Web Developer toolbar for Firefox, but we'd award that one in a second wouldn't we?
...::----::...
I am in no way affiliated with this sig.
Specially with their reference to the word "dynamite" (Alfred Nobel was the inventor of dynamite).
That particular claim (if it really has been made) is a bit steep but there is a credible theory which claims that AIDS originated from polio vaccines.
The oral polio vaccine theory IMO explains quite a lot and also has evidence to back its claims. It's not just for the tinfoil hat crowd.
More here: Origins of Aids
"The second theory, the "oral polio vaccine" or "OPV" theory, has it that AIDS began after an experimental OPV that had been cultured in chimpanzee cells was given to nearly a million Africans from the Congo (DRC), Burundi and Rwanda in the latter half of the 1950s. This hypothesis is highly controversial, and is rejected by many medical scientists, (including those who prepared and administered the vaccine). There is concerted opposition to the theory from those who publish and write in Nature and Science, the world's two leading scientific journals. However, despite the fact that many of the aforesaid scientists deny it, this is the theory that is supported by most of the available historical and scientific evidence."
Maybe a bit off-topic but interesting and maybe important as well.