Slashdot Mirror


First 96-Node Desktop Cluster Ships

Panaphonix writes "The Register reports that Orion Multisystems is shipping the first 96-node desktop cluster. 'With the new, larger system, customers get pretty much the most powerful computer around that can plug into a standard electrical socket.' According to the spec sheet, the DS-96 runs Fedora Core 2 and gets 110 GFlops sustained, 230 GFlops peak."

16 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Will it make or break orion? by nate85 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Do you think it will go over well?

  2. Re:yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No, it runs an inferior OS. I can't remember what it's called.

  3. Re:$100,000 by raehl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    $100,000/96 = ~$1,000.

    Not a bad deal.

  4. Interesting practical uses for Personal Cluster .. by torpor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. Computing?

    I mean, does Blender run on it at least? Can I do anything interesting from an 'immediate-personal' perspective with 96 nodes, and I don't just mean run Quake, or fire up "make -j 96" and such things..

    What sort of interesting modelling software is around? Could I use it to design stuff on a personal, non-hard-core science perspective? What are the practical uses for personal cluster computing?

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  5. Inefficient ? by zymano · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Merrimac 2 terraflop workstation for $20,000

    General CPU's just don't have the punch that special purpose or Fpga processors do.

    1. Re:Inefficient ? by Slashcrap · · Score: 2, Insightful

      General CPU's just don't have the punch that special purpose or Fpga processors do.

      And FPGAs or special purpose CPUs don't have the generality that normal CPUs have. There's also the small point about the Merrimac system not actually exisitng.

      PS. Thanks for linking to Roland Piquepaille's fucking blog. He doesn't get nearly enough links on Slashdot in my opinion.

    2. Re:Inefficient ? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not even a product, it's just a schematic. Talking about building a computer than only has $20K of parts, and running an actual business by selling those computers for $20K each are two very different things.

  6. Re:Question by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know this thing is nice because of the power requirements and the fact that you don't need a dedicated server room to store it, but for $100,000, you can get Microway to build you a pimptacular cluster with Dual-Opteron nodes, high-speed memory and a phat interconnect with either myrinet or infiniband. You will get a lot more work done for the same price.

    You forgot a couple of things:

    * HVAC costs
    * Realestate costs

    Remember, this is a deskside cluster. Try that with your dual-opteron cluster. And try adding up all the costs.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  7. Re:Question by glesga_kiss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He's also forgotten about hiring an extra 2 guys at least to maintain the extra machines. A selling point of this box will be that "it just works". Pay for a support contract and wammo, you've got a cheap low maintainence cluster. For people working on top-secret stuff (who else needs clusters? ;-), hiring people is a risk and the vetting process is expensive.

  8. Suspicious by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I gotta say.. I'm a tad suspicious here.. there seems to be a lot of marketing flash (no pun intended) and scarce details.

    What kind of CPUs are we talking about ? I'm assuming we're talking non-shared memory here, and therefore nodes that "retain" their own identies. But then isnt each cpu running it's own kernal ? That is.. This ISNT SMP , right ?

    I think the details could be a lot clearer here. The lack of tech specs or simple explinations, and excessive use of buisness speak "Efficiency" "unprecendented power" etc. makes me a tad nervous.

  9. Wha...? by raehl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    General purpose processors have *WAY* more punch. Especially punch per dollar, as FPGAs are fairly expensive.

    They're just general purpose, whether they be scalar (CPU) or vector (GPU), so an FPGA that is specifically optimized for a specific problem will kick the general purpose processor's butt - in that specific problem.

    But try running Quake III on an FPGA - it will be killed by the CPU in processing and killed by the GPU in graphics. Assuming you can even cram everything you need to be a CPU or GPU into the limited real estate of the FPGA in the first place.

  10. Re:$100,000 by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >When building cluster of stock PCs it should not be more then $500/PC.

    What are you talking about?

    The now (in)famous Apple cluster cost them about 5 million for 1,100 nodes or $5K/node.
    http://radio.weblogs.com/0112083/G5cluster.html
    And that was supposed to be a good deal.

  11. Re:Question by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The vetting process isn't just expensive, it's time consuming too. I don't know about the States, but here in the UK getting security cleared (to "normal" level, I forget the correct term) takes about 3 months. That's not 3 months of filling in forms, of course, but it is three months during which the person can't work on the project while you wait.

  12. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Space (e.g.real estate) and energy(electricity) is a premium in places such as Japan. Could be interesting to see how sales develop in such places.

  13. Re:Question by brsmith4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You don't need two extra guys. I manage 5 clusters myself on a regular basis. Granted, it would be a hell of a lot of work if I couldn't enlist the help of a few people every once in a while, but for the most part, its a one man job. As well, to the poster claiming that I didn't take into account the cost of storage, I know this thing is nice because of the power requirements and the fact that you don't need a dedicated server room to store it, I'm fairly sure that I roughly addressed that. BTW, we need clusters and none of our researchers has top secret clearance ;-P

  14. Re:$100,000 by Grayputer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about "plugs into a single 110 volt US outlet". This thing draws 1500 watts PEAK. That's about 14 amps for the math challenged or well under the recommended max for a 20-amp circuit from your household panel (think coffee maker on steroids). Let's try your barebones system approach and let's say you tweak it to use 50 watts per system (good luck). That's 50 watts per system multiplied by roughly 100 systems => 5Kwatts or 3+ times the power consumption. PLUS as an added bonus you get 96 cases, external cabling, at least 96 fans, a dozen power strips, and assorted other toys to trip over. Oh yeah and a few weeks of setup, integration, burn in, and testing.