Slashdot Mirror


32-bit to 64-bit - Obsolesence Pains Again?

robotsrule asks: "Having been in the computer industry a while I distinctly remember the pain of making the 16-bit to 32-bit transition, when Windows made the change to 32-bit support. Any developer who remember the joys of thunking and other kludges that were meant to help code conversions also remembers the arcane marathon debug sessions too. I have not been keeping up with the latest Microsoft Longhorn technical news, or the plans that the Linux community has for 64-bit platform support. Does anyone out there have a reliable prediction for the amount of system shock we are facing when either Longhorn or 64-bit Linux comes out? Will I lose all my favorite 32-bit development tools again as I watch the backward compatibility support dry up as the 64-bit O/S platforms are adopted? Or are the O/S manufacturers making happy noises about long-term support for existing development languages and tools?"

1 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. Re:64-bit linux by swillden · · Score: 4, Funny

    The 16 to 32-bit PC transition didn't require you to go out and buy new hardware. Years from now, we might all be forced to use a true 64bit AMD to run anything.

    You mean I won't be able to run new software on my 286 any more? That BLOWS, man!

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.