Slashdot Mirror


Current Crypto Trends with Bruce Schneier

Saint Aardvark writes "SecurityFocus has published an interview with Bruce Schneier. Fascinating stuff, especially the level-headed assessments of the NSA, spam and the impact of full disclosure: 'Q: Since most crypto protocols on the internet, such as SSL or SSH, uses public-keys to build a secure channel, wouldn't a unexpected public disclosure create a chaos on the internet ? A: No. Chaos is hard to create, even on the Internet. Here's an example. Go to Amazon.com. Buy a book without using SSL. Watch the total lack of chaos.'"

6 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. Whoops! by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Informative
    OP here -- that link to Schneier's blog should be:

    http://www.schneier.com/blog

    Sorry about that!

  2. Wrong URL by eyegor · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
  3. Re:Article text, ROT13'd for the paranoid by iMaple · · Score: 2, Informative

    In case, the article is /.ed ROT13 the encrypted text to get back the article :)
    ROT13 en/decoder

  4. Re:Article text, ROT13 for the paranoid by Dark+Coder · · Score: 4, Informative

    For the uninitiated... ROT13 encoder/decoder is available as a FireFox plugin over at MNenhy

  5. Re:Nothing constructive from Schnier anymore by snorklewacker · · Score: 4, Informative

    > So basically he's telling me to live in a shack in the woods like the Unabomber if I want security.

    Go read "Beyond Fear". That's precisely the opposite of what he's saying. He's saying security is not a binary all-or-nothing thing, and that for the vast majority of people, there really is such a thing as "secure enough". Not that the current state of the art is anywhere close to that, but that it's not some platonic ideal, it's in fact quite reachable now.

    --
    I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
  6. Re:Article text, ROT13'd for the paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Your version:
    cat a | tr '[a-zA-Z]' '[n-za-mN-ZA-M]' | less
    A slightly more efficient version:
    tr '[a-zA-Z]' '[n-za-mN-ZA-M]' < a | less