Goblet of Fire Teaser Trailer Released

bryan8m writes "The teaser trailer for the next installment of the Harry Potter series has hit the web. The clip begins with a bit of a flashback but quickly turns to the triwizard tournament with some amazing visuals. And there is new director (again): Mike Newell."

Comments

Late as usual

[Anonymous Coward]

It was on Apple's movie trailers site a week ago today.

direct link

[slashjames]

http://movies.apple.com/movies/wb/harry_potter_gob let/hp_gobletoffire_480.mov

Re:direct link

[Seft]

Actually, the direct link is: http://movies.apple.com/movies/wb/harry_potter_gob let/hp_gobletoffire_m480.mov

Re:direct link

[Anonymous Coward]

Actually, the first one only gives a small file to the link for the m480 file. People who want to download the actual video needs the m480, not just 480.

Anyway, those who want full screen:
http://movies.apple.com/movies/wb/harry_potter_gob let/hp_gobletoffire_ifs.mov

filerush torrent...

[i88i]

here tis

Re:the reason

[bjprice]

there's been a new director for every film so far

Not true.

Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone and Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets were both directed by Chris Columbus (this one, not that one).

Re:Quicktime install

[Anonymous Coward]

http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/standalone .html

Re:the reason

[Blackeagle_Falcon]

What were they thinking getting rid of a director who successfully translated books to movies?

They didn't exactly "get rid" of Chris Columbus. He chose not to direct the Prisoner of Azkaban in order to spend more time with his family (he was still an executive producer though). According to the IMDB, he wanted to come back and direct the fourth film, but Warner Brothers chose Mike Newell instead.

Re:Terry Gilliam almost directed the first movie

[jfengel]

Too bad he thinks that. Cuaron had nothing but nice things to say Columbus on the commentaries. Duh, and if you read between the lines you can see that Cuaron wasn't entirely pleased.

But Cuaron rightly praised Columbus for a number of things right with those movies. He picked a knockout cast, both kids and adults, and an awesome location.

Some of the failings of the first three (yeah, all three) I put on the screenwriter, who seems to have a tendency to substitute action scenes for character moments. That made the first two movies rather long for kids' movies and still leaving out some important scenes from the books. Still, that's Rowling's chosen screenwriter, so I guess it's what she wanted.

I much prefer the gritty realism of the third movie to the first two. But for Gilliam to dismiss Sorcerer's Stone as "crap", given that he's been rather hit-and-miss himself, seems undeservedly arrogant.

Columbus made basic kiddie fare. Gilliam's would have been a fascinating change, though in some ways I like the idea of the first intro movie being a more pedestrian adaptation of the book, to serve as a foundation for the sequels to be more interesting. I'd love to see Gilliam direct one of the future movies, but with an attitude like that there's no way they're going to let him.

Of course, the studio was probably dead set against him from the start. He has a tendency to create truly grand visions and then run over schedule and budget. Baron Munchausen almost didn't make it, and his Don Quixote did fail. He blames it on circumstances and cheapskate studios.

Me, I'm a director myself (stage, rather than film), and I know that disasters happen and you need to be flexible to fix them. The documentary Lost in La Mancha is very favorable to him, and he did have a run of bad luck, but it also sounds to me like he failed to have backup plans and cut things too close to the wire. Under those circumstances projects will always fail, because things go wrong.

He needs a better unit production manager, or he needs to listen more closely to the one he has.